Mohammad Jubair Siddiq @ Mohammad Jubair Siddiq Memon v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court administrative listing order dated 11.08.2025 (Ravindra V. Ghuge & Gautam A. Ankhad, JJ.): hearing of charted matters deferred for paucity of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders to continue subject to compliance; affidavits in reply/rejoinder before next date; Petitioners to supply spare copies for issuance of notice within 14 days, failing which matters stand dismissed against unserved Respondents on the 15th day; matters listed 02.09.2025 to 15.09.2025 under categories For Urgent Orders, For Orders and Due Admission. No statute or precedent cited; no issues framed or holdings recorded.
What did the court decide?
Administrative adjournment/listing order: matters could not be heard for paucity of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders, if any granted earlier, to continue subject to compliance; affidavits in reply/rejoinder to be filed before the next date; Petitioners to supply spare copies for notice within 14 days, failing which matters stand dismissed against unserved Respondents on the 15th day; matters listed per chart between 02.09.2025 and 15.09.2025.