Disposed¶19

Gramoddhar Vidya Prasarak Shikshan Sanstha, Thr. President, Hingna, Nagpur and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Tribal Development Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Bombay HC14 Aug 2025WP/3872/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Gramoddhar Vidya Prasarak Shikshan Sanstha; State of Maharashtra Tribal Development Department; appointment of Administrator; stay order; threatening communications; coercive action restraint; affidavit of subsequent events; AGP affidavit; interim order; Nagpur Bench; W.P. No. 3872/2025; W.P. No. 5085/2025; Coram Anil S. Kilor and Rajnish R. Vyas, JJ.; next date 17/11/2025.

What did the court decide?

Interim order: petitioners permitted to file affidavit of subsequent events (copy to learned AGP); learned AGP to file affidavit explaining issuance of the letters despite the stay; respondent authority restrained from taking any coercive action till next date; matter stood over to 17/11/2025. ¶19

Gramoddhar Vidya Prasarak Shikshan Sanstha, Thr. President, Hingna, Nagpur and Anr. vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Tribal Development Dept., Mumbai and Ors. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 39) WP 3872-2025.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 3872 OF 2025

¶4

AND

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 5085 OF 2025

¶6

GRAMODDHAR VIDYA PRASARAK SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, THR. PRESIDENT, HINGNA, NAGPUR AND ANR.

¶7

...Vs...

¶8

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT., MUMBAI AND ORS.

¶9

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's orders Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders

¶10

Shri A.D.Mohgaonkar, Advocate for petitioners. Shri R.S.Subhedar, Advocate for Intervenor in W.P. No. 3872/2025. Shri H.D.Marathe, AGP for respondent(s)/State in W.P. No. 3872/2025. Shri P.P. Pendke, AGP for respondent(s)/State in W.P. No. 5085/2025.

¶11

CORAM: ANIL S. KILOR AND

¶12

RAJNISH R. VYAS, JJ.

¶13

DATED : 29^th SEPTEMBER, 2025.

¶14

Shri Mohgaonkar, learned counsel for the petitioners points out that, despite the stay granted to appointment of the Administrator, the respondent(s) authority, to harass the petitioners, are issuing various communications threatening to the petitioners of coercive action. The petitioners, therefore, want to file an affidavit bringing all the subsequent facts on record.

¶15

The petitioners are permitted to file affidavit stating the subsequent events. It is directed that the petitioners shall supply copy of such affidavit to the learned AGP for the State.

¶16

After supplying such copy of an affidavit, the learned AGP is expected to file on record an affidavit explaining the circumstances, in which, such letters were

¶17

2 39) WP 3872-2025.odt

¶18

issued, despite a fact that this Court has granted stay to the appointment of the Administrator.

¶19

We further direct the respondent(s) authority not to take any coercive action till next date.

¶20

Stand over to 17/11/2025.

¶21

(RAJNISH R. VYAS, J.)

¶22

(ANIL S. KILOR, J.)

¶23

B.T.K.

¶24

Signed by: Mr. B.T. Khapekar Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 29/09/2025 20:49:17

Gramoddhar Vidya Prasarak Shikshan Sanstha, Thr. President, Hingna, Nagpur and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Tribal Development Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gramoddhar Vidya Prasarak Shikshan Sanstha, Thr. President, Hingna, Nagpur and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Tribal Development Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

United Bank Employees Union, Thr. General Secy., Kamal Rangwani and Anr. vs the Assistant General Manager and Disciplinary Authority, Mumbai and Ors.

Rajendra @ Raju S/O Damodarrao Atkar vs State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Dept. of School Education and Sports, Mumbai and Ors.

Manda Wd/O Keshav Somalkar and Another vs Western Coal Fields Limited (Wcl), Thr. Chairman-Cum-Managing Director, Nagpur and Anr.

Digambhar S/O. Anandrao Deshbhratar vs Rameshwar Pandagal, Secy., Nagar Parishad, Digdoh, Nagpur

Narendra S/O. Sheshraoji Pawade vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Revenue and Forest, Mumbai and Ors.

The Union of India, Thr. Principal Chief Personnel Officer, Bilaspur, Chattisgarh and Anr. vs Dr. Himanshu Shardanand Jaiswal