Disposed¶11

Maharashtra Mathadi Transport and General Kamgar Union v. the State of Maharashtra Ministry of Industries Energy and Labour Dept. and Ors.

Bombay HC22 Apr 2025WP/3683/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court common order dated 23.09.2025, Coram Ravindra V. Ghuge & Ashwin D. Bhobe, JJ.; procedural listing order - office objections to be removed within two weeks; reply/rejoinder affidavits before next date; spare copies for notice within 14 days failing which dismissal against unserved respondents on 15th day; ad-interim/interim orders to continue; matters scheduled 15.10.2025 to 21.11.2025 under Fresh Admission, Urgent Admission, Urgent Order, Due Admission and Final Hearing.

What did the court decide?

Ad-interim/interim orders, if any granted earlier, to continue, subject to removal of office objections within two weeks; matters directed to be listed on dates between 15.10.2025 and 21.11.2025. ¶11

Maharashtra Mathadi Transport and General Kamgar Union vs the State of Maharashtra Ministry of Industries Energy and Labour Dept. and Ors. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Digitally signed by GAURI GAURI AMIT AMIT GAEKWAD GAEKWAD Date: 2025.09.26 11:04:10 +0530

¶2

Gauri Gaekwad .. 1 .. common order

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION/ CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.

¶5

DATE : SEPTEMBER 23, 2025.

¶6

P.C. :-

¶7

At the time of rising at 5.45 p.m., the matters

¶8

mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.7 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.

¶9

In several of these matters, there are office

¶10

objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.

¶11

Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.

¶12

The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed before the next date.

¶13

Matters in which service of notice is awaited, put up

¶14

after service.

¶15

Gauri Gaekwad .. 2 .. common order

¶16

Matters in which though notices were issued, the office could not process the notice due to non-supply of spare copies, the Petitioner shall supply spare copies for issuance of notice within 14 days, failing which, the matters in which copies are not supplied, would stand dismissed as against the unserved Respondents on the 15^th day. If copies are supplied, office to issue notice to the unserved Respondents, returnable after four weeks.

¶17

Subject to the above, list these matters as under :-

¶18

Serial Nos. of matters on the Board	To be listed on	To be listed in the category
5 to 26	15.10.2025	Fresh Admission
28 to 35	15.10.2025	Fresh Admission
36 & 37	15.10.2025	Fresh Admission
40 to 53	15.10.2025	Fresh Admission
54 to 63	13.11.2025	Urgent Admission
69 to 71	14.11.2025	Urgent Order
73 & 74	14.11.2025	Urgent Order
75 to 96	17.11.2025	Due Admission
98 to 104	17.11.2025	Due Admission
105 to 124	18.11.2025	Due Admission
126 to 134	18.11.2025	Due Admission
135 to 140	19.11.2025	Due Admission
142 to 164	19.11.2025	Due Admission
165 to 168	20.11.2025	Due Admission

¶19

Gauri Gaekwad .. 3 .. common order

¶20

170	20.11.2025	Due Admission
172 & 173	20.11.2025	Due Admission
176 to 178	20.11.2025	Due Admission
179	21.11.2025	Final Hearing

¶21

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )

Maharashtra Mathadi Transport and General Kamgar Union v. the State of Maharashtra Ministry of Industries Energy and Labour Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maharashtra Mathadi Transport and General Kamgar Union v. the State of Maharashtra Ministry of Industries Energy and Labour Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Maharashtra Navnirman Kaamgar Sena vs State of Maharashtra and 3 Ors.

Maharashtra Navnirman Kaamgar Sena vs State of Maharashtra through Office of Government Pleader, and 3 Ors.

Maharashtra Navnirman Kaamgar Sean vs State of Maharashtra and 3 Ors.

Shakuntala Tulshiram Gangurde and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

Manoj Sunil Ripote vs the Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai through Commissioner

M/S. Trimos Metrology (I) Private Limited Thr. Mr. Vivit Vikram Dalal vs Trimos Sa Thr. Poa.Mr. Natarajan Ramaswamy Iyer