Disposed¶8

Madhubala Bharatnath Yadav Alias v. the Commissioner the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Bombay HC26 Aug 2025WP/3203/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court common order dated 26.08.2025 (Shree Chandrashekhar & Aarti Sathe, JJ.); blanket adjournment of Daily and Supplementary Board matters (Appellate Side and Original Side) due to paucity of time, to CIS-fixed dates between 08/09/2025 and 16/10/2025; continuation of operative ad-interim/interim relief till next dates; purely administrative, no issues decided, no statutes or cases cited.

What did the court decide?

Adjournment of all remaining matters on the Daily and Supplementary Board to the dates fixed as per CIS; ad-interim/interim relief operative on the date of the order directed to continue till the respective next dates. ¶8

Madhubala Bharatnath Yadav Alias vs the Commissioner the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

SPS-B.D. PANDIT paucity

¶2

BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT

¶3

Digitally signed by BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT Date: 2025.09.02 17:52:17 +0530

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION AND ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER

¶5

CORAM : SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR & AARTI SATHE, JJ

¶6

DATE : 26^th AUGUST, 2025

¶7

P.C. :-

¶8

On account of paucity of time, rest of the matters on Daily and Supplementary Board stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per the CIS.

¶9

Sr. Nos. C.I.S. DATE (Appellate Side) 941 10/10/2025 (Appellate Side) 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 10/10/2025 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 (Appellate Side) 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 41, 42, 43, 44 13/10/2025 (Appellate Side) 50, 51, 52, 53, 55, 56 13/10/2025 (Appellate Side) 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 14/10/2025 67, 68, 69, 70, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77 (Appellate Side) 81, 82, 83, 84 14/10/2025 (Appellate Side) 86, 87, 88, 89, 91, 92, 93, 95, 96, 15/10/2025 97, 98, 99, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108 (Appellate Side) 109 (M) 08/09/2025 (Appellate Side) 110 15/10/2025 (Appellate Side) 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 16/10/2025 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 146, 147 (Original Side) 942 10/10/2025 (Original Side) 1 (M) 01/10/2025 (Original Side) 2 (M) 16/09/2025 (Original Side) 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11 09/09/2025

¶10

¶11

SPS-B.D. PANDIT paucity

¶12

Sr. Nos.	C.I.S. DATE
(Original Side)13, 14, 15	10/10/2025
(Original Side)16, 37, 46, 47, 48, 49	13/10/2025
(Original Side)57, 78, 79, 80, 85, 90,	14/10/2025
(Original Side)94, 118, 145, 148, 149	15/10/2025

¶13

If in any of the above matters, ad-interim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. If ad-interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected.

¶14

[AARTI SATHE, J.] [ SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, J. ]

¶15

Madhubala Bharatnath Yadav Alias v. the Commissioner the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madhubala Bharatnath Yadav Alias v. the Commissioner the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Dr. Sanjeevani Kiran Shah vs the State of Maha. Thr. Principal Secretary Department of Higher and Technical Education and Ors.

Mehul Abhilash Jhaveri vs Hdfc Bank Ltd.

Dr. Sanjeevani Kiran Shah vs the State of Maha. Thr. Principal Secretary Department of Higher and Technical Education and Ors.

Vishal Parshuram Chavan vs The State of Maharashtra Through its Chief Secretary and Principal Secretary of Urban Development

Krishna Ganpati Kesarkar vs State of Maharashtra Thr Sec. Skill Dev and Enter. Dept and Ors.

Smt. Surekha Tukaram Jagdale vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.