Disposed¶10

Satish Salian v. Central Bureau of Investigation (Cbi) and Ors.

Bombay HC23 Jun 2025WP/3199/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court common order, 18.08.2025 (Ghuge & Ankhad, JJ.) - purely procedural directions: remove office objections within two weeks; interim/ad-interim orders continue subject thereto; reply/rejoinder affidavits before next date; unserved matters taken up after service; spare copies for notice within 14 days failing which dismissal against unserved respondents on 15th day; listing on 17.09.2025 (For Orders / Due Admission / Final Hearing). No statutes, precedents, party names or amounts appear in the order.

What did the court decide?

Continuation of the ad-interim/interim orders, if any granted earlier, subject to removal of all office objections within two weeks. ¶10

Satish Salian vs Central Bureau of Investigation (Cbi) and Ors. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Digitally signed SUNNYANKUSHRAOTHOTE by SUNNYANKUSHRAOTHOTEDate:2025.08.19 15:47:59 +0530

¶2

Sunny .. 1 .. common order

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, JJ.

¶5

DATE : AUGUST 18, 2025.

¶6

P.C. :-

¶7

At the time of rising at 5.30 pm, the matters

¶8

mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.

¶9

In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.

¶10

Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.

¶11

The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed before the next date.

¶12

Matters in which service of notice is awaited, put up

¶13

after service.

¶14

Sunny .. 2 .. common order

¶15

Matters in which though notices were issued, the office could not process the notice due to non-supply of spare copies, the Petitioner shall supply spare copies for issuance of notice within 14 days, failing which, the matters in which copies are not supplied, would stand dismissed as against the unserved Respondents on the 15^th day. If copies are supplied, office to issue notice to the unserved Respondents, returnable after four weeks.

¶16

Subject to the above, list these matters as under:-

¶17

Serial Nos. of matters on the Board	To be listed on	To be listed in the category
40 to 51	17.09.2025	For Orders
52 to 65	17.09.2025	Due Admission
67 and 68	17.09.2025	Due Admission
69 and 70	17.09.2025	For Final Hearing

¶18

(GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )

Satish Salian v. Central Bureau of Investigation (Cbi) and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satish Salian v. Central Bureau of Investigation (Cbi) and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Marvel Edge Realtors Private Limited Thr. Its. Director Mr. Vishwajeet Subhash Jhavar and Anr. vs Mr. Shankar Santdas Kishnani and Ors.

Marvel Edge Realtors Private Limited Thr. Its. Director Mr. Vishwajeet Subhash Jhavar and Anr. vs Mr. Shankar Santdas Kishnani and Ors.

Mohammed Saif Mushtaq Chasmawala vs State of Maharashtra

Marvel Edge Realtors Private Limited Thr. Its. Director Mr. Vishwajeet Subhash Jhavar and Anr. vs Mr. Shankar Santdas Kishnani and Ors.

Marvel Edge Realtors Private Limited Thr. Its. Director Mr. Vishwajeet Subhash Jhavar and Anr. vs Mr. Shankar Santdas Kishnani and Ors.

B.S. Pawar (Engineers and Contractors) Thro. Its Proprietor vs the Chairman and Managing Director Maharashtra State