Satish Pandmakar Bildikar v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Paucity of time adjournment order; Bombay High Court Aurangabad Bench; division bench of Manish Pitale and Y.G. Khobragade, JJ.; 2nd July 2025; batch adjournment of numerous writ petitions (2017-2025) with civil applications; adjourned to 11.08.2025 through 22.08.2025 in urgent/admission category; office objections to be removed before next date; affidavit in reply/rejoinder to be filed before next date; ad-interim orders to continue until next date; DPT 2.7; no substantive adjudication, no parties or counsel identified.
What did the court decide?
Continuation of existing ad-interim orders, if any, until the next date, subject to removal of office objections and filing of affidavits; all listed matters adjourned due to paucity of time to dates between 11.08.2025 and 22.08.2025 in urgent/admission category. ¶7