Balaji Hanmanlu Karhade v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench; coram Manish Pitale & Y. G. Khobragade, JJ.; order dated 7th August, 2025 ('DPT-7th August'). Batch adjournment for paucity of time of dozens of writ petitions (2017–2025) with civil applications, PILs 26/2024, 72/2021, 46/2024, 83/2024, and Commercial Appeal No. 4 of 2019 (final hearing); next dates 29.09.2025 to 09.10.2025 including urgent/due admission category listings. Operative directions: removal of office objections one week before next date; filing of reply/rejoinder affidavits by next date; continuance of subsisting interim orders until next date. AGPs for Respondent-State: S. D. Ghayal, V. M. Kagne, S. S. Joshi, S. V. Hange, Neha Kamble, N. D. Raje, R. D. Raut, S. N. Deshmukh, S.N. Kendre, S. R. Wakale, S. S. Dande. Contains no issues, holdings, statutory constructions, precedent treatments, or monetary awards.
What did the court decide?
Purely administrative adjournment: due to paucity of time, the entire listed batch of matters (writ petitions from 2017 to 2025, civil applications therewith, PIL Nos. 26/2024, 72/2021, 46/2024, 83/2024, and Commercial Appeal No. 4 of 2019) was adjourned to dates between 29.09.2025 and 09.10.2025 (several in the urgent/due admission category; the commercial appeal for final hearing). Office objections to be removed one week before the next date; affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, to be filed on or before the next date; existing interim orders to continue until the next date. No question of law or fact was adjudicated.