Rajendra Dayaram Alias Dayanand Birhari v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench; bench of Manish Pitale and Y. G. Khobragade, JJ.; order dated 02-09-2025; batch adjournment ('paucity of time') of numerous writ petitions (2015-2025), civil applications and PILs (including PIL Nos. 6/2019, 35/2022, 28/2023, 70/2024) to hearing dates from 30.09.2025 through 03.12.2025; office objections to be removed; affidavit in reply/rejoinder to be filed; ad-interim orders continued; counsel appearances confined to Government Pleader/Addl. Government Pleaders/AGPs for Respondent/State; no statute, precedent, issue or holding.
What did the court decide?
Administrative adjournment only: all listed matters adjourned to the dates mentioned against them (ranging 30.09.2025 to 03.12.2025); office objections to be removed before the next date; affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, to be filed on or before the next date; ad-interim orders, if any passed earlier, to continue until the next date.