Dismissed¶11

Rajendra S/O. Gyandeorao Tarale v. the State of Maharashtra, through Its Chief Secretary, General Administration Deptt., Mumbai

Bombay HC7 May 2025WP/2848/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal as infructuous; Writ Petition No.2848/2020; petitioner Rajendra; respondents State of Maharashtra and another; Pursis Stamp No.03/2024 dated 05-03-2024; infructuous due to subsequent developments; Nagpur Bench; Justices Avinash G. Gharote and Abhay J. Mantri; advocates Yoshita V. Paliwal (h/f V.K. Paliwal), A.D. Mohgaonkar, T.H. Khan AGP; decided 07/05/2025.

What did the court decide?

In view of the petitioner's Pursis stating that the petition had become infructuous due to subsequent developments, the Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. ¶11

Rajendra S/O. Gyandeorao Tarale Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Its Chief Secretary, General Administration Deptt., Mumbai — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

pursis 03.2024.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶4

PURSIS STAMP NO.03/2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2848/2020 Rajendra V State of Maharashtra and another

¶5

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- -

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders or directions
and Registrar's orders

¶7

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ -
Ms Yoshita V. Paliwal, Advocate h/f Mr. V.K. Paliwal, Advocate
for petitioner.

¶8

Mr. A.D. Mohgaonkar, Advocate for resp. No. 2.
Ms T.H. Khan, AGP for resp. No. 1.

¶9

CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND
 ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
 DATE : 07/05/2025

¶10

Heard.

¶11

ii.The petitioner has filed Pursis bearing Stamp
No.03/2024 dated 05-03-2024 stating therein that this
petition becomes infructuous due to subsequent developments.
iii.In view of the Pursis, the petition is dismissed as
infructuous.

¶12

 (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)

¶13

Deshmukh

Rajendra S/O. Gyandeorao Tarale v. the State of Maharashtra, through Its Chief Secretary, General Administration Deptt., Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra S/O. Gyandeorao Tarale v. the State of Maharashtra, through Its Chief Secretary, General Administration Deptt., Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sohail Ahmed Ansari Khaleel Ahmed vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Education and Sports Department, Mumbai and Others

Manish Ratnadeep Kumbhare and Others Vs Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur Thr. Its Chairman and Another

Kishor S/O Hansraj Jham and Others vs Nagpur Municipal Corporation, Thr. Its Commissioner, Nagpur and Another

Jayashree D/O Ashok Gotmare and Others Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Secretary, Higher and Technical Education, Mumbai and Others

The Commissioner of Customs, Nagpur Commissionerate, Nagpur Vs M/S. Ramabors Exim LLP. Alimited Partnership, Lucknow (U.P.)

M.R. Bahu-Uddeshiya Vikas Sanstha, Gonida, Thr. Preisident, Anil Rajendra Gondane vs State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Higher and Technical Education Dept., Mumbai and Anr.