Allowed¶16

The Commissioner of Customs, Nagpur Commissionerate, Nagpur v. M/S. Ramabors Exim LLP. Alimited Partnership, Lucknow (U.P.)

Bombay HC7 May 2025CAT/7/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Nagpur Bench, Bombay High Court; CAT No.06/2025 & CAT No.07/2025 in Custom Appeal Nos.01/2025 (D) & 02/2025 (D); Commissioner of Customs, Nagpur v. M/s Al Udai Exim LLP / M/s Ramabros Exim LLP; extension of time to decide show cause notice; four weeks granted in place of two months sought; order dated 03-04-2025 referred; applications allowed; Gharote & Mantri JJ.; decided 07/05/2025.

What did the court decide?

Additional four weeks' time granted to decide the show cause notice. ¶16

The Commissioner of Customs, Nagpur Commissionerate, Nagpur Vs M/S. Ramabors Exim LLP. Alimited Partnership, Lucknow (U.P.) — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CAT 06.25.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶4

CAT No.06/2025 in CUSTOM APPEAL NO.01/2025 (D) The Commissioner of Customs, Nagpur V M/s Al Udai Exim LLP Lucknow (UP)

¶5

and

¶6

CAT No.07/2025 in CUSTOM APPEAL NO.02/2025 (D)

¶7

The Commissioner of Customs, Nagpur V M/s Ramabros Exim LLP, Lucknow

¶8

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- -

¶9

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders or directions
and Registrar's orders

¶10

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ -

¶11

Mr. S.N. Bhattad, Advocate for appellant.
Mr. H.J. Khandwani, Advocate for respondent.

¶12

CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND

¶13

 ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
 DATE : 07/05/2025

¶14

Heard.

¶15

ii.By these applications, the applicant seeks an
additional two months' time for deciding the show cause
notice in terms of the order dated 03-04-2025.

¶16

iii.Considering the reasons disclosed in the
application, we deem it appropriate to grant four more weeks
of time to decide the show cause notice. Hence, both
applications are allowed in the above terms.

¶17

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)

¶18

Deshmukh

The Commissioner of Customs, Nagpur Commissionerate, Nagpur v. M/S. Ramabors Exim LLP. Alimited Partnership, Lucknow (U.P.)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Commissioner of Customs, Nagpur Commissionerate, Nagpur v. M/S. Ramabors Exim LLP. Alimited Partnership, Lucknow (U.P.)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sohail Ahmed Ansari Khaleel Ahmed vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Education and Sports Department, Mumbai and Others

Manish Ratnadeep Kumbhare and Others Vs Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur Thr. Its Chairman and Another

Kishor S/O Hansraj Jham and Others vs Nagpur Municipal Corporation, Thr. Its Commissioner, Nagpur and Another

Jayashree D/O Ashok Gotmare and Others Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Secretary, Higher and Technical Education, Mumbai and Others

M.R. Bahu-Uddeshiya Vikas Sanstha, Gonida, Thr. Preisident, Anil Rajendra Gondane vs State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Higher and Technical Education Dept., Mumbai and Anr.

Om Agro Organics, Yavatmal, Thr. Authorised Signatory, Avinash S/O Narayanrao Dudhe Vs the Union of India, Thr. Secretary, Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, New Delhi and Anr.