Govind Pandurang Sasane v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC28 Jul 2025WP/2672/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Administrative common order of the Bombay High Court (Ghuge & Ankhad JJ., 19.08.2025) for multiple criminal/civil appellate matters not reached due to paucity of time: office objections to be removed within two weeks; existing ad-interim/interim orders to continue subject to compliance; spare copies due within 14 days on pain of dismissal against unserved respondents on the 15th day; matters listed for 18-19.09.2025 (Urgent Order/For Orders/Due Admission/For Final Hearing). No substantive legal issue decided; no parties, advocates, statutes or precedents named.

What did the court decide?

Continuation of ad-interim/interim orders earlier granted, subject to compliance (removal of all office objections within two weeks); administrative directions for service, spare copies and listing of the matters. ¶¶11

Govind Pandurang Sasane vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Laxmi .. 1 .. common order 19.08.2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

LAXMI

¶4

SUBHASH SONTAKKE

¶5

Digitally signed by LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE Date: 2025.08.22 11:47:25 +0530

¶6

P.C. :-

¶7

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, JJ.

¶8

DATE : AUGUST 19, 2025.

¶9

At the time of rising at 1.00 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.

¶10

In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.

¶11

Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.

¶12

The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed before the next date.

¶13

Matters in which service of notice is awaited, put up after service.

¶14

Laxmi .. 2 .. common order 19.08.2025

¶15

Matters in which though notices were issued, the office could not process the notice due to non-supply of spare copies, the Petitioner shall supply spare copies for issuance of notice within 14 days, failing which, the matters in which copies are not supplied, would stand dismissed as against the unserved Respondents on the 15^th day. If copies are supplied, office to issue notice to the unserved Respondents, returnable after four weeks.

¶16

Subject to the above, list these matters as under:-

¶17

Serial Nos. of matters on the Board	To be listed on	To be listed in the category
12	18/09/2025	Urgent Order
13 to 14	18/09/2025	For Orders
15 to 16	18/09/2025	Due Admission
18 to 42	18/09/2025	Due Admission
44 to 50	18/09/2025	Due Admission
51 to 67	19/09/2025	Due Admission
69 to 82	19/09/2025	Due Admission
83 to 91	19/09/2025	For Final Hearing

¶18

(GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )

Govind Pandurang Sasane v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Govind Pandurang Sasane v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Nilesh Narayan Shedge @ Bablu vs Central Bureau of Investigation and Anr.

Pamela Menezes vs North Region Cyber Crime Police Station and Anr.

Vishal Vilas Salvi vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Sudhakar Kushaba Gode vs Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority

Datta Panchayatan and Ors. vs Maruti Malu Salunkhe and Ors.

Nihal Saeed Alware and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra