Disposed¶7

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. Union of India through the Ministry

Bombay HC15 Sept 2025WP/2330/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court common order dated 15-09-2025 (Shree Chandrashekhar, CJ with Gautam A. Ankhad, J) adjourning Daily Board and Supplementary Board matters for paucity of time to CIS-fixed dates (17/09/2025 to 13/10/2025); interim and ad-interim relief continuing till the respective next dates. Administrative listing/scheduling order only - no ratio decidendi, no party names, no statutory or precedent treatment; of practical use solely to establish continuity of interim protection between listing dates.

What did the court decide?

Matters on the Daily Board and Supplementary Board adjourned to CIS-fixed dates; ad-interim/interim relief operative till 15.09.2025 continues till the respective next dates. ¶7

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai vs Union of India through the Ministry — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Adjournment due to paucity.doc

¶2

BALAJI GOVINDRAO PANCHAL

¶3

Digitally signed by BALAJI GOVINDRAO PANCHAL Date: 2025.09.19 11:08:46 +0530

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION AND ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER

¶5

CORAM : SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, CJ & GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, JJ DATE : 15^th SEPTEMBER 2025.

¶6

P.C. :

¶7

On account of paucity of time, rest of the matters on Daily Board and Supplementary Board stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per the CIS.

¶8

Sr. Nos.	C.I.S. Date	To be listed in the category
(Original Side)924,925,926	19/09/2025
(Original Side)942,954	17/09/2025
(Original Side)943,944,38	22/09/2025
(Original Side)35,42	23/09/2025
(Original Side)56,59	24/09/2025
(Appellate Side)921	17/09/2025	Circulation
(Appellate Side) 922, 923, 927, 928, 929, 930, 931, 932, 933, 934,935,936,937,938,939,940,941,22	19/09/2025	Circulation
(Appellate Side)946,947,948,949,950,952,953,957	22/09/2025	Due Admission
(Appellate Side)3	18/09/2025	Fresh Admission
(Appellate Side)13,14,16,17,18,19,20,21	22/09/2025	Circulation
(Appellate Side)26	23/09/2025	Circulation
(Appellate Side)36,37,39,41,43 44	23/09/2025	Due Admission
(Appellate Side)34,45,46,48,53,54,55,57,58,61,	24/09/2025	Due Admission
(Appellate Side) 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85	13/10/2025	For Orders (Due Matters)

¶9

If in any of the above matters, ad-interim relief or interim relief

¶10

is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. If ad-interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected.

¶11

[GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE]

¶12

1/1

¶13

BGP

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. Union of India through the Ministry

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. Union of India through the Ministry

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Neeta Narayan Nikate vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Majestic Infracon Pvt. Ltd. vs Bank of India

Chandrabhan Ramdev Singh vs Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika (Education Department) Th. the Municipal Commissioner

Asaram Kanashi Patil vs Education Inspector, North Division, Greater Mumbai and 4 Ors.

Dilkesh M. Singh vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai through Commissioner

Gayatri Panwar vs the Municipal Corporation of Greter Mumbai through the Commissioner