Disposed¶8

Mohammed Sajid Azad Mohammed Naeem v. the State of Maharashtra through Educatin Department

Bombay HC12 Sept 2025WP/2255/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court common order dated 05.08.2025; Coram Shree Chandrashekhar & Manjusha Deshpande, JJ.; adjournment of Daily and Supplementary Board matters (Original Side and Appellate Side) due to paucity of time; matters adjourned to CIS dates 19/08/2025, 21/08/2025, 22/09/2025, 23/09/2025, 24/09/2025, 25/09/2025, 26/09/2025, 29/09/2025, 30/09/2025 and 01/10/2025; continuation of ad-interim and interim relief till next dates; administrative/procedural order only, no merits, no statutory or precedent discussion.

What did the court decide?

Purely administrative adjournment: matters on the Daily and Supplementary Board adjourned to CIS-fixed dates (19/08/2025 to 01/10/2025); operative ad-interim/interim relief continued till the respective next dates. ¶8

Mohammed Sajid Azad Mohammed Naeem vs the State of Maharashtra through Educatin Department — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Kartikeya Goti

¶2

paucity

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION AND

¶4

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER

¶5

CORAM : SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.

¶6

DATE : 5^th AUGUST, 2025

¶7

P.C. :-

¶8

On account of paucity of time, rest of the matters on Daily and Supplementary Board stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per the CIS.

¶9

Sr. Nos.	C.I.S. DATE
(Original Side)47-Mentioned	19/08/2025
(Appellate Side) 59,61,62,63,64,80,97,188,209	19/08/2025
(Appellate Side)	21/08/2025
174- Mentioned
(Appellate Side) 48,49,50,51,52,56,58,60	22/09/2025
(Original Side) 67,69,70,71,72,73,84,85,90	23/09/2025
(Appellate Side) 65,68,74,75,76,77,78,79	23/09/2025
(Original Side)	24/09/2025
92,93,94,111,115,143,152,153,154,155
(Appellate Side) 81,82,83,86,87,88,89,91,95,96,98,99,100,101,102, 103,104,105	24/09/2025
(OriginalSide) 156,157,158,160,161,178,183,184,185,226	25/09/2025
(Appellate Side) 106,107,108,109,110,113,114,116,117,118,119, 120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128	25/09/2025
(Appellate Side) 129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139, 140,141,142,144,145,146,147,148,149	26/09/2025
(Appellate Side)	29/09/2025
150,151,159,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,
171,172,173,175,176,177,179,180,181

¶10

¶11

Kartikeya Goti paucity

¶12

Sr. Nos.	C.I.S. DATE
(Appellate Side) 182,186,187,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196, 197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,20 8	30/09/2025
(Appellate Side) 210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220, 221,222,223,225,227,228,229,230,235,236,237, 238,239	01/10/2025

¶13

If in any of the above matters, ad-interim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. If ad-interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected.

¶14

[MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. ] [SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, J. ]

¶15

Mohammed Sajid Azad Mohammed Naeem v. the State of Maharashtra through Educatin Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Sajid Azad Mohammed Naeem v. the State of Maharashtra through Educatin Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rajendra Mohanlal Bhargav vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Farhat Iqbal Abdul Rashid Ansari vs Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai

Mukesh Purohit vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Harmet Kaur Paramjit Singh Godi vs the State of Mahrashtra School Education and Ports Department

Santosh Pilaji Sabale and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra Throu. the Sec. Dept of School Education and Sports and Ors.

Santoshkumar Shankar Raut and Ors. vs the State of Maharashta Throu. the Sec. Dept of School Education and Sports and Ors.