Chetana Kiran Shinde v. Deputy Director of Education Pune Division and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Maharashtra education-sector employment; approval/rejection of school appointment proposals; defective proposals with wrong appointment dates; appointments 2012-2017 prior to State recruitment ban; Management's admission of blunder; impugned orders held to have lost efficacy; directions to file revised proposals within 30 days and pass reasoned orders within 60 days; conditional costs threat; writ petitions disposed of; Bombay High Court; Deputy Director of Education, Pune Division.
What did the court decide?
Impugned orders treated as having lost efficacy; Management to file defect-free revised proposals to Respondent No.1 within 30 days, with a warning of heavy costs (donated to the State Government) upon recurrence; Respondent No.1 to consider the revised proposals under the applicable Rules and Policies and pass reasoned orders within 60 days; Writ Petitions disposed of on these directions.