Dudhsakhar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Throu. Its President / Sec. and Anr. vs the State of Maharashtra Throu. the Sec. School Education Dept and Ors.

¶1

Digitally signed by GAURI GAURI AMIT AMIT GAEKWAD GAEKWAD Date: 2025.04.22 11:01:13 +0530

¶2

904(i).WP-18522-2024.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.18522 OF 2024

¶5

Dudhsakhar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal & Anr. ….Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ….Respondents

¶8

Mr. Chetan Patil i/b. Mr. Mandar G. Bagkar for the Petitioners. Mr. P.P. Kakade, Addl. GP a/w. Mr. S.B. Kalel, AGP for the State. Mr. Prashant Bhavake for Respondent No.4.

¶9

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ. DATE : 28^th MARCH, 2025

¶10

P.C. :-

¶11

After several rounds of hearing in this matter, the

¶12

Petitioner Management and Respondent No.4 have arrived at a meeting point and have jointly tendered the minutes of order dated 27^th March, 2025. The signed copy of the minutes of order (5 pages) is taken on record and marked as ‘ X-1 ’ for identification.

¶13

For the sake of brevity, the minutes of order X-1, are verbatim reproduced hereunder :

¶14

Heard the Counsels for the respective parties. The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, 1950 being aggrieved by the order dated 05-08-2024 issued by respondent

¶15

This order has been modified by speaking to the minutes of the order dated 16.04.2025.

¶16

1 of 5

¶17

Gauri Gaekwad

¶18

904(i).WP-18522-2024.odt

¶19

No.2 herein.

¶20

The respondent no.5 herein has been working as a teaching employee in petitioner No.2 Junior College since 01-08-2010, earlier on C.H.B and thereafter as a part time employee. The husband of respondent no.4 was also working on part time teaching post in petitioner No.2 Junior College. He died while he was in service on 15-10-2020. The respondent no.4 has sought appointment on compassionate basis in petitioner no.2 Junior College.

¶21

One full time teaching post for the subject of Marathi became vacant in petitioner no.2 Junior College due to the retirement of one of its employee namely V.D Shelke on attaining age of superannuation on 31-05-2024. The respondent no.5 who was working on part-time post had submitted a letter to the petitioner no.1 management on 01-05-2024 seeking his upgradation on full time post, which was due to fall vacant on 31-05-2024.

¶22

In pursuance of the relevant Government Resolutions providing for upgradation of part time employees to full time post and the letter of respondent no.5 dated 01-05-2024, the petitioner no.1 management appointed respondent no.5 on the post of full time Assistant Teacher for the subject of Marathi w.e.f. 01-07-2024. The respondent no.4 does not have any objection to the appointment of respondent no.5 on the aforesaid post of full time Assistant Teacher and undertakes before this Hon'ble Court that she will not raise any dispute in respect of the said appointment in future.

¶23

This order has been modified by speaking to the minutes of the order dated 16.04.2025.

¶24

2 of 5

¶25

Gauri Gaekwad

¶26

904(i).WP-18522-2024.odt

¶27

Due to the upgradation of the respondent no.5 on full time teaching post the part time post which was earlier occupied by him is now vacant. On the said part time teaching post, the petitioner no.1 management will appoint Respondent No.5 w.e.f. 01-04-2025 as a part time Shikshan Sevak.

¶28

The petitioner no.2 will submit the proposal seeking approval to the appointment of respondent no.5 on the post of full time Assistant Teacher and to the appointment of Respondent No.4 on the post of part time Shikshan Sevak within a period of 30 days from the date of this order. The respondent no.2 will decide the said proposal within a period of 45 days from the date of the receipt of the said proposals.

¶29

In the Secondary School run by the petitioner no.1 management one full time teaching post is due to fall vacant, as one of its employee viz. Dattatraya Tukaram Kamble, who was appointed on D.Ed. scale w.e.f. 11-06-1990, is due to retire on attainting the age of superannuation in 31-012026. The petitioner no.1 Management will appoint respondent no.4 on the post of full time Shikshan Sevak w.e.f. 01-02-2026 in the Secondary School on the place occupied by Dattatraya Tukaram Kamble, on D.Ed. scale. The Headmaster of the Secondary School will submit the proposal seeking approval to the appointment of the respondent no.4 on the post of full time Shikshan Sevak within a period of 30 days from the date of her appointment and respondent no.3 will decide the said proposal within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of the proposal in accordance with law.

¶30

In view of the aforesaid order, the impugned order dated 05-08-2024 is quashed and set aside.

¶31

This order has been modified by speaking to the minutes of the order dated 16.04.2025.

¶32

3 of 5

¶33

Gauri Gaekwad

¶34

904(i).WP-18522-2024.odt

¶35

The Writ Petition stands disposed off accordingly in aforesaid terms with no order as to cost.

¶36

In addition to the above minutes of order, which we

¶37

approve, we direct the parties as under :

¶38

(a) Since Petitioner No.1 Management has undertaken to issue an appointment order to Respondent No.4, as set out in the minutes of order, such order would be issued on 1^st April, 2025 and Respondent No.4 would be permitted to join duties on the same day;

¶39

(b) In terms of the agreement between the parties, the order to be issued to Respondent No.4, by way of appointment as a full time Shikshan Sevak on a permanent post which would fall vacant on the superannuation of Dattatraya Tukaram Kamble, would be issued one week prior to the date of joining on 1^st February, 2026;

¶40

(c) The Petitioner No.1 Management would forward the proposal for approval to the part time appointment of Respondent No.4 as well as of Respondent No.5, within 15 days from today;

¶41

(d) Insofar as Respondent No.4 is concerned, since the appointment is on compassionate basis, the Deputy Director of Education, Respondent No.2, would grant approval to her appointment, within 15 days from the date of receipt of the proposal;

¶42

(e) Insofar as Respondent No.5 is concerned, the concerned Authority would consider the proposal on its own merits and a reasoned order be passed within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt

¶43

This order has been modified by speaking to the minutes of the order dated 16.04.2025.

¶44

4 of 5

¶45

Gauri Gaekwad

¶46

904(i).WP-18522-2024.odt

¶47

of the proposal. If there are any deficiencies, the deficiencies would be cited before the Management in one stroke and time would be granted to remove the deficiencies without rejecting the proposal. After the Management removes the deficiencies, the said proposal of Respondent No.5 would be considered on its merits;

¶48

(f) After Respondent No.4 is appointed on a vacant post, with effect from 1^st February, 2026, the Management would tender the proposal within a period of 15 days from the date of Respondent No.4 joins the duties, to the Education Officer (Secondary), Respondent No.3 herein. The proposal shall be complete in all respects. Since the appointment of Respondent No.4 is on compassionate basis, Respondent No.3 shall approve the appointment of Respondent No.4, subject to acquiring the qualification of TET as directed hereinabove;

¶49

(g) Respondent No.4 would ensure that she passes the teacher’s eligibility test (TET) or the CTET, in three consecutive attempts or three years, whenever the Government holds the TET or CTET exam in the light of the Government Resolution dated 2^nd September, 2024, whichever is later.

¶50

4. This Petition is disposed off in terms of the reproduced

¶51

minutes of order and the above directions.

¶52

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

¶53

This order has been modified by speaking to the minutes of the order dated 16.04.2025.

¶54

5 of 5

¶55

Gauri Gaekwad

Dudhsakhar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Throu. Its President / Sec. and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra Throu. the Sec. School Education Dept and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dudhsakhar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Throu. Its President / Sec. and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra Throu. the Sec. School Education Dept and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Cavas R Majai vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Rajendra Shankarrao Garud vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Its Secretary, Tribal Developmentand Anr.

Swaroopa Sachin Patil vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary and Ors.

Mona Ghansham Gite vs the State of Maharashtra School Education and Sports Department, through Govt Pleader High Court Os

Sachin Kashinath Gambhire vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Dept. of Edu. and Sports and Ors.

Vishwajit Sudhakar Mangaonkar vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secrtary School Education Dept and Ors.