Shailesh Shivaji Karambe v. Surekha Shailesh Karambe

Bombay HC15 Jan 2025WP/18482/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court; Madhav J. Jamdar, J.; Writ Petition No.18482 of 2024; Shailesh Shivaji Karambe v. Surekha Shailesh Karambe; order dated 22 January 2025; notice returnable 25 February 2025; undertakings accepted; deposits of Rs.70,000/- and Rs.5,000/- per month; Family Court Kolhapur; ad-interim relief; prayer clause (b); without prejudice to rights and contentions.

What did the court decide?

Ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) of the Writ Petition, following the Petitioner's accepted undertakings to deposit Rs.70,000/- within four weeks and Rs.5,000/- monthly (w.e.f. February-2025, on or before the 10th of each month) in the Family Court, Kolhapur till disposal of the Writ Petition; notice issued to the Respondent, returnable on 25th February 2025. ¶¶18

Shailesh Shivaji Karambe vs Surekha Shailesh Karambe — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶¶18

Issue for consideration

Whether the Petitioner is entitled to ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) of the Writ Petition, notice having been ordered to the Respondent.

¶¶18

Court's answer

On her counsel's statements made on instructions, the Petitioner was to deposit Rs.70,000/- in the Family Court, Kolhapur within four weeks and to continue depositing Rs.5,000/- w.e.f. February-2025 on or before the 10th of each month in the Family Court, Kolhapur, till the disposal of the present Writ Petition.

¶¶17

Ratio / Principle

Notice was ordered to be issued to the Respondent, returnable on 25th February 2025.

¶¶11

Key takeaways

In addition to the Court notice, the Petitioner was directed to serve the Respondent by private service and file an affidavit of service before the returnable date.ratio¶¶13
The statements made by the Petitioner's learned Counsel, on instructions of the Petitioner, were accepted as undertakings given to the Court.ratio¶¶17
Ad-interim relief was granted in terms of prayer clause (b) in view of the said statements.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bombay High Court, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction — Writ Petition No.18482 of 2024, Shailesh Shivaji Karambe v. Surekha Shailesh Karambe (Madhav J. Jamdar, J., 22 January 2025). Interlocutory order: (i) notice issued to the Respondent, returnable on 25th February 2025, with service by private service and affidavit of service directed before the returnable date; (ii) the statements of the Petitioner's counsel, on instructions, accepted as undertakings to the Court — deposit of Rs.70,000/- in the Family Court, Kolhapur within four weeks and continuing monthly deposits of Rs.5,000/- w.e.f. February-2025 on or before the 10th of each month till disposal of the Writ Petition; (iii) ad-interim relief granted in terms of prayer clause (b); (iv) deposits expressly clarified to be without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties. The content of prayer clause (b), any impugned order, statutory provisions and precedent cases are not reproduced in the order.

Shailesh Shivaji Karambe v. Surekha Shailesh Karambe

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shailesh Shivaji Karambe v. Surekha Shailesh Karambe

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sameer Belechand Momin vs Nilam Jamil Sayyad and Ors.

Chittaranjan Gopalrao Nivargi vs Deepali Chittranjan Nivargi

Sameer Belechand Momin vs Nilam Jamil Sayyad and Ors.

Parshuram Shivram Naik vs Sushila Parshuram Naik and Anr.

Manisha Amit Khajanchi vs Amit Kanakraj Khajanchi

Devdutt Prakash Deshpande vs Nikhila Devdutt Deshpande