Kantilal Mansukh Solanki vs State of Maharashtra

(b) That, the Hon'ble Court be please to issue Writ of Mandamus and/or any other Writ as per nature and circumstance, and direct Respondent No.2 TO 5 Το provide permanent alternate accommodation to the members of Bhim Nagar CHS Ltd, who are left to live and suffer in inhumane and unhygienic condition.

¶19

(c) That, the Hon'ble Court be please to issue Writ of Mandamus and/or any other Writ as per nature and

¶20

Page 1 of 3

¶21

Laxmi

¶22

14-WP-1843-24.DOC

¶23

circumstance, and direct Respondent No.6 to construct Rehab building on the adjacent SRA Society namely Mahatoshri CHS Ltd. (SRA Society) and shift the Tenants of the Bhim Nagar CHS Ltd.

¶24

d) That, the Hon'ble Court be please to issue Writ of Mandamus and/or any other Writ as per nature and circumstance, and direct Respondent No.6 the developer to construct rehab building for the Bhim Nagar CHS members.

¶25

In alternate to above:

¶26

d) That this authority be pleased to cancel, terminate, revoke Annexure-I, II, LOI and IOD and any other permissions in the favour of the Respondent No.6 M/s. Omkar Realtor and Developer Pvt. Ltd. in the respect of M/s. Bhim Nagar CHS Ltd. SRA Scheme in respect of CS no.155(pt), 174(pt), 177(pt), 1/177(pt) and 185 of Village Parel Sewree Division, Parale Bhoiwada, Mumbai - 400 012. And terminate the appointment of developer in respect to the said SRA Scheme.

¶27

e) To terminate the appointment of developer in respect to the said SRA Scheme.

¶28

(d) The Honourable Court may be pleased, to pass any such other order as this Hon'ble Court deems fit..

¶29

(e) The Honourable Court may be pleased, to confer any such other reliefs as necessary in the circumstances.”

¶30

We are informed that M/s. Omkar Realtors & Developers Pvt. Ltd. could not carry the project forward. As informed to the Court, the project involves as of now more than three societies and concerns about 4000 slum dewellers. By an order dated 29^th April 2024, passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Slum Rehabilitation Authority LOI granted in favour of M/s. Omkar Realtors & Developers Pvt. Ltd. was terminated. We are also informed that now M/s. Alperton

Page 2 of 3

Laxmi

14-WP-1843-24.DOC

Developers has been pointed as a Developer to undertake the slum rehabilitation scheme. Accordingly, LOI dated 14^th August 2025 has been issued in favour of M/s. Alperton Developers. If that be the case and that the Petitioners are already 3 members of the Bim Nagar Co-op. Housing Society, (which is registered), the Petitioners would be required to be heard along with the other slum dwellers and would be entitled to all the benefits which have been offered to the other slum dwellers and now by the new Developer appointed namely, M/s. Alperton Developer.

¶35

Accordingly keeping all contentions of the Petitioners to seek appropriate benefits under the scheme if they are so eligible, we dispose of the Petition. Needless to observe that all contentions not only on the Permanent Alternate Accommodation to which the Petitioners are eligible but also in respect of the claim which the Petitioners intend to make as is permissible in law in regard to the transit rent is expressly kept open.

¶36

The Petition stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No costs.

¶37

(AARTI SATHE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)

¶38

Page 3 of 3

¶39

Laxmi

Kantilal Mansukh Solanki v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kantilal Mansukh Solanki v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Apollo India Services LLP vs State of Maharashtra

Rika Global Impex Limited vs Union of India and Ors.

M/S. Uma Exports Limited vs Union of India through the Joint Secretary and Ors.

Himtaj Ayurved Private Limited vs Union of India

Manohardevi Berisalsingh Rajput Alias Manoribai vs Vardhan Associates

Charan Singh Surjit Singh Gujral vs Union of India and Ors.