Disposed¶10

Faimidabi Syd. Gulab v. State of Maha., Thr. Honble State Minister, Ministry of Revenue and Forest Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Bombay HC11 Aug 2025WP/1752/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ Petition No.1752/2025; Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench; Prafulla S. Khubalkar, J.; order dated 11-08-2025; land allotment to disabled persons category; rejection of application; husband's pension cited as ground; house on plot admeasuring 1124 sq.ft. cited as ground; petitioner claims ownership of only 53.1 sq.mtr. jointly with two others; contention that joint small holding is no disqualification; notice issued returnable after four weeks; AGP M. S. Joshi waived service for respondent nos. 1 to 3; advocate S. Chimote for petitioner; matter pending, no holding on merits.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief decided; notice issued to the respondents, returnable after four weeks. Petition remains pending adjudication. ¶10

Faimidabi Syd. Gulab vs State of Maha., Thr. Honble State Minister, Ministry of Revenue and Forest Dept., Mumbai and Ors. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

wp 1752.25.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶4

Writ Petition No.1752/2025 Faimidabi Syd. Gulab V State of Maharashtra and others

¶5

- - - - ------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

- - - - ---------------------------Mr. S. Chimote, Advocate for petitioner. M. S. Joshi, AGP for respondent nos. 1 to 3.

¶7

CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J. DATE : 11-08-2025.

¶8

Heard Mr. Chimote, learned Counsel for the petitioner.

¶9

Petitioner’s grievance is against the rejection of application for allotment of land from the category of disabled persons. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have rejected the petitioner’s application by observing that the petitioner’s husband is getting pension and the petitioner is having house on a plot admeasuring 1124 sq.ft. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s husband is not getting any pension and the observation that the petitioner is having house on the land admeasuring 1124 sq.ft. is also incorrect. He submits that the petitioner is the owner of land admeasuring 53.1 sq.mtr. alongwith two other persons and this cannot be considered to be a disqualification.

¶10

Issue notice to the respondents, returnable after four weeks.

¶11

2 wp 1752.25.odt

¶12

Learned AGP waives service of notice on behalf of

¶13

respondent nos.1 to 3.

¶14

( Prafulla S. Khubalkar, J. )

¶15

Deshmukh Signed by: Mr. S.Deshmukh Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 11/08/2025 18:26:04

Faimidabi Syd. Gulab v. State of Maha., Thr. Honble State Minister, Ministry of Revenue and Forest Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Faimidabi Syd. Gulab v. State of Maha., Thr. Honble State Minister, Ministry of Revenue and Forest Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sunita Santosh Rathod vs Honble Minister, Rural Development Department, Mumbai and Others

Prakash Rajeshwarrao Bejankiwar and Others vs Ramu Paikuji Yedme and Others

Vijay S/O. Shankarrao Talewar vs Prafull S/O. Sadashiv Buty (Huf) Thr. Karta, Shrikrishna P. Buty

Sushant Sunilchandra Das vs Saraswati Sushant Das

Jagannath S/O Prakash Kulal and Another vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Rural Development Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Gopal Baliram Gulhane and Others vs Sadruddin Jivanbhai Dobria, (Dead), Thr. Lrs., Fatimabai Wd/O Sadruddin Dobria and Others