Disposed¶16

Suraj Domaji Patbhaje v. the Union of India, Thr. Secy., Ministry of Mines, New Delhi and Ors.

Bombay HC24 Apr 2025WP/1684/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ Petition No. 1684 of 2025; neutral citation 2025:BHC-NAG:5086-DB; Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench; challenge to Central Administrative Tribunal Nagpur order dated 13.02.2025; representation dated 27.03.2024; violation of Clause 4.4 of Transfer Policy; speaking order dated 24.04.2024 endorsed to Government of India; affidavit of Director General, Geological Survey of India; petitioner to superannuate 30.06.2025; refrained from interference in extraordinary jurisdiction; petition disposed of; no order as to costs; bench: Nitin W. Sambre and Vrushali V. Joshi.

What did the court decide?

The Court refrained from causing interference in the extraordinary jurisdiction and disposed of the petition. ¶15

Suraj Domaji Patbhaje vs the Union of India, Thr. Secy., Ministry of Mines, New Delhi and Ors. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

18.WP.1684.2025.odt 1/2

¶2

2025:BHC-NAG:5086-DB

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 1684 OF 2025

¶5

Suraj Domaji Patbhaje Vs.

¶6

The Union of India, through its Secretary, Ministry of Mines, New Delhi & Ors.

¶7

Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram,__________________________________________________________________________ appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.

¶8

Mr. Vishal Anand, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. C.J. Dhumane, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. A.B. Mahajan, Advocate for Respondent No.4.

¶9

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 8 th MAY, 2025.

¶10

P.C.

¶11

We have heard Mr. Vishal Anand, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in support of the challenge to the order dated February 13, 2025 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bench at Nagpur.

¶12

The fact remains that the petitioner is going to superannuate on June 30, 2025.

¶13

We have gone through the record and shown certain indulgence to observe that the decision in compliance with the order of the Tribunal directing to decide the representation was not in tune with what has been directed. However, through an affidavit tendered during the course of hearing duly sworn by the Director General, Geological Survey of India, Government of India, it is informed that the representation of the petitioner dated March 27, 2024 was based on the violation of Clause 4.4 of the Transfer Policy and though the decision taken by the speaking order dated April 24, 2024 was endorsed to the Government of India, the Government of India has not raised any objection to the said views.

¶14

18.WP.1684.2025.odt 2/2

¶15

In view of aforesaid, we refrain ourselves from causing interference in the extraordinary jurisdiction.

¶16

The petition accordingly stands disposed of. No order as

¶17

to costs.

¶18

( MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

¶19

Vijaykumar

¶20

Signed by: Mr. Vijay Kumar Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 09/05/2025 19:08:06

Suraj Domaji Patbhaje v. the Union of India, Thr. Secy., Ministry of Mines, New Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suraj Domaji Patbhaje v. the Union of India, Thr. Secy., Ministry of Mines, New Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rohan S/O. Santosh Parate Vs the Committee for Verification of S.T. Certificates, Yavatmal Thr. Member Secretary.

Prashant Sahebrao Patil and Another Vs Vitthal Bhaurao Patil and Others

Tribal Gowari Samaj Vidyarthi Yuwak Sangh Kruti Samiti, Thr. Chairman, Ramnath B. Kalsarpe Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Secretary of Tribal Devpt. Dept., Mumbai

Gajanan Deorao Bhagawat Vs the State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Co-Operation, Marketing and Textile Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Ku. Lata D/O Jagannath Vaidya (Maiden Name Lata W/O Kashinath Nibrad) Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Department of Technical and Vocational Education, Mumbai

Yograj S/O Bhaurao Hatwar - in Jail Vs State of Maharashtra Thr Secretary, Home Dept, Mantralaya, Mumbai