Balu Pandu Tate Since Deceased through Lrs v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Procedural adjournment order only — Bombay High Court, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, single judge (Milind N. Jadhav), 23 June 2025. A batch of matters (Serial Nos. 48 to 147, with gaps) adjourned en masse to 18 and 19 August 2025 on account of paucity of time; previously granted ad-interim/interim relief, if any, continues. No facts, arguments, statutory provisions, precedent engagements or merits determinations appear; the order has no ratio and no precedent value, and is useful only for tracking hearing dates and the continuation of interim relief in the listed matters.
What did the court decide?
Purely administrative common order: owing to paucity of time, matters at Serial Nos. 48 to 51, 53, 54, 56 to 70, 72 to 81, 83 to 92 & 95 to 100 adjourned to 18 August 2025, and Serial Nos. 101 to 111 and 113 to 147 adjourned to 19 August 2025; ad-interim/interim relief, if any, earlier granted, to continue in the meanwhile.