Idfc First Bank Limited v. State of Maharashtra through P.P. High Court Mumbai and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Paucity-of-time common order, Bombay High Court, dated 30.04.2025 (A.S. Chandurkar & M.M. Sathaye, JJ.): remaining Daily and Supplementary Board matters (Appellate Side and Original Side, serial numbers as tabulated in the order) adjourned per CIS-fixed dates between 11.06.2025 and 04.07.2025; ad-interim/interim relief operative on the order date to continue till the respective next dates; ad-interim relief not granted for a limited period remains unaffected. Purely administrative adjournment — no merits decision, no parties, advocates, statutes or precedents appear in the text. Keywords: paucity order, adjournment, CIS dates, interim relief, Daily and Supplementary Board, Bombay High Court.
What did the court decide?
Administrative adjournment: the remaining matters on the Daily and Supplementary Board stand adjourned to the dates fixed as per the CIS (ranging 11.06.2025 to 04.07.2025); ad-interim or interim relief operative till the date of this order is to continue to operate till the respective next dates, and ad-interim relief not granted for a limited period remains unaffected.