Nileshkumar Rajyaguru v. Union of India Thr the Secretary and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ Petitions 15214 & 15218 of 2025, Bombay High Court, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, Bharati Dangre & Shyam C. Chandak JJ., order dated 17 November 2025. Petitioners Harsh Nileshkumar Rajyaguru and Nileshkumar Rajyaguru (counsel Dr. Sujay Kantawala with Aishwary Kantawala, Jeffry Caleb, Ayushi Jha) challenge a Look Out Circular by Respondent No.2 and its renewals as contrary to the Ministry of Home Affairs Office Memorandum. Respondents unrepresented despite reported private service; notice issued returnable 1st December 2025; hamdast granted; service permitted by private mode and on Union of India counsel; A.P.P. waived service for Respondent No.5-State (Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP). No statutes, precedents, findings or quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
Interim order only: notice issued to the Respondents, returnable on 1st December, 2025; hamdast granted; notice additionally permitted to be served through private mode and upon the Counsel representing Respondent No.1-Union of India; the learned A.P.P. waived service for Respondent No.5-State. No adjudication of the merits.