Manju Hoshiyarchand Sanghavi v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ Petition No.147 of 2025; High Court of Judicature at Bombay; Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction; Article 226 Constitution of India; writ of mandamus; MCGM; Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai; Respondent No.1 BMC; redevelopment; Developer; permissions and certificates; stop-work notice; Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreement; PAAA; MHADA; stamping and registration; transit rent; fresh cheque; parking; Development Control and Promotion Regulation 2034; undertakings; disposed; no costs; G. S. Kulkarni; Aarti Sathe; Sharad Bansal; Zahan Satalvad; Meena Dhuri.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed of on the strength of parties' undertakings: PAAA between petitioner and Respondent No.4 to be finalized, stamped and registered within two weeks; fresh cheque towards transit rent to be issued within one week; petitioner's entitlement to parking under DCPR 2034 kept expressly open for incorporation in the PAAA; no costs.