Santosh Kisan Shetty v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Urban Town Planning Dept and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court common order dated 11.12.2025; Coram Ravindra V. Ghuge & Ashwin D. Bhobe, JJ.; procedural listing/scheduling order; office objections to be removed within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders continued; spare copies to be supplied within 14 days failing which dismissal against unserved respondents on 15th day; matters listed 12.01.2026 to 05.02.2026 including Special Pension Board, fresh/urgent/due admissions, urgent orders, disposal and final hearing; no merits adjudicated; no statutes or precedents cited; individual parties not named in the order.
What did the court decide?
Purely procedural common order: subject to removal of office objections within two weeks and filing of affidavit-in-reply/rejoinder, if any, one week before the next date, ad-interim/interim orders, if any granted earlier, were continued, and the board matters were listed on specified dates between 12.01.2026 and 05.02.2026 across categories including Special Pension Board, Fresh/Urgent/Due Admissions, Urgent Orders, For Passing Orders, For Disposal and For Final Hearing. No matter was adjudicated on merits.