Shiv Samarth Industries through Its Prop Sarika Bhausaheb Belure v. the Commissioner GST and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, order dated 21.11.2025 in W.P. No. 12012/2021 (Sanjay Ganpat Bharati v. State of Maharashtra & Others); coram Vibha Kankanwadi & Hiten S. Venegavkar, JJ., per court; AGPs A.B. Girase, S.K. Tambe, A.M. Phule, R.S. Wani, S.B. Narwade for respondent State; no counsel stated for petitioner. Paucity-of-time batch adjournment to 09.03.2026-17.03.2026; interim relief/undertaking/statements to continue till next date. Purely administrative listing/scheduling order - no merits adjudicated, no statutes, no precedents, no framed issues, no monetary amounts; usable only as a scheduling/status reference, not as a precedent.
What did the court decide?
Administrative adjournment of the entire listed batch of matters (including the instant writ petition, shown against 09.03.2026) owing to paucity of time, with continuation of interim relief/undertaking/statement, if any, till the next date. Order issued 'PER COURT' (jointly by both judges).