Arshad Rahi Abdul Sadique v. the State of Maharashtra Thr the Medical Education and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court common order, 24-11-2025, Coram Ravindra V. Ghuge & Ashwin D. Bhobe, JJ.: batch of matters (Board Serial Nos. 43-63 through 231-250) not heard due to paucity of time at 6.05 p.m.; office objections to be removed within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders to continue; reply/rejoinder affidavits one week before next date; matters awaiting service listed after service; spare copies within 14 days failing which dismissal against unserved Respondents on 15th day, else notice returnable after four weeks; listing chart 08/12/2025 to 04/02/2026 (Fresh Admission, Urgent Admission, Due Admission, Final Hearing at Admission Stage). Administrative/procedural order only - no issues decided, no statutes or precedents cited.
What did the court decide?
Procedural common order: the matters in the paragraph 7 chart could not be heard at rising (6.05 p.m.) for paucity of time; directions issued that office objections be removed within two weeks, existing ad-interim/interim orders continue, reply/rejoinder affidavits be filed at least one week before the next date, matters awaiting service be listed after service, spare copies be supplied within 14 days (failing which matters stand dismissed against unserved Respondents on the 15th day), and all matters be listed per the chart between 08/12/2025 and 04/02/2026.