Union Bank of India Thr Its Authorized Officer v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Union Bank of India v. State of Maharashtra and Others, Writ Petition No.12814 of 2024, High Court of Judicature at Bombay, decided 26 March 2025 by A. S. Chandurkar and M. M. Sathye, JJ. Interlocutory adjournment-type order: two-week extension of time granted, at the joint request of counsel, to decide Interim Application No.337 of 2024 in the writ petition; matter stood over to 23/04/2025; petition taken up 'not on board'. Separate Interim Application No.15281 of 2024 filed in the same writ petition by Rahul Jain and others. Counsel: Dimple Tejani and Noor I. Bakali for the petitioner; N.C. Walimbe and S.P. Kamble for respondent no.1; Somya (with T.N. Tripathi & Co.) for respondent no.4. No statutory references, cited precedents, framed issues, or merits holdings appear in the text.
What did the court decide?
Purely interlocutory relief: at the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, the time to decide Interim Application No.337 of 2024 was extended by a further period of two weeks, and the matter was directed to stand over to 23/04/2025.