Metalyst Forgings Limited through Its Authorised Representative v. Sanjay Mahadeo Khune
Case brief
What is this about?
Administrative speaking-to-minutes order, not a ruling on merits. Metalyst Forgings Limited v. Sanjay Mahadeo Khune, Writ Petition No. 12729 of 2025 (with Writ Petition Nos. 12730 and 12731 of 2025), High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad; Coram: Arun R. Pedneker, J.; decided 20.11.2025. Petitioner's advocate: Mr. Amit A. Yadkikar. Praecipe moved to correct order dated 12.11.2025: 'Labour' rectified as 'Industrial' (paragraph 1, line 1) and time 04:00 p.m. added after date 26.11.2025 (paragraph 2); corrected copy to be uploaded; copies issued deemed corrected; motion disposed. No statute or precedent cited; no monetary quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
Corrections directed to be carried out in order dated 12.11.2025 (word 'Labour' rectified as 'Industrial' in paragraph no.1, line no.1; time 04:00 p.m. added after date 26.11.2025 in paragraph no.2); corrected copy of the order to be uploaded; copies already issued deemed corrected accordingly.