Rajendra Sukhdeo Mirgane v. the Chief Officer and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court civil writ petition disposed of as infructuous on 30 January 2025 (A.S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata, JJ.). Petitioner: Rajendra Sukhdeo Mirgane (counsel A.A. Kumbhakoni, Senior Advocate, with Ashutosh M. Kulkarni and Akshay A. Kulkarni). Respondents: The Chief Officer, Barshi Municipal Council & Ors. (counsel Jagdish G. Aradwad (Reddy) for Respondent No.1; Rupali Shinde, A.G.P. for Respondent No.3-State). Impugned order dated 22 March 2021 of Respondent No.1-Corporation; fresh revised permission subsequently granted, rendering the petition infructuous. No merits adjudication, no statutory provisions or precedents cited, no quantum involved. Citable only for the fact of disposal as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
On instructions, learned senior counsel for the Petitioner stated that, in view of the subsequent grant of fresh revised permission by Respondent No.1-Corporation, the impugned Order dated 22nd March 2021 does not survive and the Petition has become infructuous; the Court proceeded on that basis.