Disposed¶21

Nandkumar Infrastructure LLP Thr. Authorised Person v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC11 Dec 2025WP/11755/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

tender clubbing; clubbing of tenders; Public Works Department Government Resolutions 17.12.2016 and 19.09.2017; continuous length of road; works distinctly apart; internal roads; laying of drainage line; Nandkumar Infrastructure LLP; State of Maharashtra; Kolhapur Circuit Bench; interim directions; Affidavit-in-Reply three weeks; grant of tender subject to outcome of petition; listed 11.11.2025.

What did the court decide?

No final relief; interim directions only: Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 to file Affidavit-in-Reply within three weeks; Petition listed on 11th November 2025; grant of tender made subject to the outcome of the Petition. ¶21

Nandkumar Infrastructure LLP Thr. Authorised Person vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

920-Wp-11755-2025.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

¶3

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 11755 OF 2025

¶5

Nandkumar Infrastructure LLP … Petitioner Versus

¶6

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents

¶7

Mr. Suryajeet P. Chavan a/w. Mr. Ajinkya Walekar for the Petitioner. Mr. Siddheshwar B. Kalel, A.G.P. for the Respondent No.1-State. Mr. Sarang S. Aradhye (Through V.C.) a/w. Mr. Shantanu Gurav & Ms. Dnyaneshwari Utpat for Respondent Nos.2 & 3.

¶8

——————

¶9

Coram : M. S. Karnik & Sharmila U. Deshmukh, JJ. Date : 16^th October 2025.

¶10

P. C. :

¶11

1. The challenge in the present Petition is to the clubbing of tenders which has been issued by the Respondent Nos.2 & 3.

¶12

2. By placing reliance on the Government Resolutions (G.R.) dated 17^th December 2016 and dated 19^th September 2017 issued by the Public

¶13

Works Department, Mr. Chavan, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that the clubbing of the tenders is permitted only if

¶14

1 of 2

¶15

osk

¶16

920-Wp-11755-2025.doc

¶17

where the work is one continuous length of the road and not in respect of works which are distinctly apart from each other.

¶18

3. Mr. Aradhye, learned counsel appearing for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 seeks time as the Petition was served upon the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 on 15^th October 2025. He would further dispute the applicability of the G.R.’s, which are issued by the Public Works Department and would submit that the tenders in the present case are in respect of internal roads and laying of drainage line. He seeks time to file Affidavit-in-Reply.

¶19

4. Let the Affidavit-in-Reply be filed within a period of three weeks from today.

¶20

5. List on 11^th November 2025.

¶21

6. It is made clear that the grant of tender will be subject to the

¶22

outcome of the Petition.

¶23

[ Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. ] [ M. S. Karnik, J. ]

¶24

Digitally signed by OMKAR SHIVAHAR OMKAR KUMBHAKARN SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Date: 2025.10.17 11:39:07 +0530

¶25

2 of 2

¶26

osk

Nandkumar Infrastructure LLP Thr. Authorised Person v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nandkumar Infrastructure LLP Thr. Authorised Person v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sushmma Rajaram Kothawale and Others vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary and Others

Nandkumar Infrastructure LLP vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Sujita Narayan Chopade and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary and Others

Prabhakar Manik Dahiphale vs the State of Maharashtra Thou Its Principal Sec. Other Backward Bahujan Welfare Dept and Ors.

Prashant Prabhakar Shelar vs the State of Maharashtra

Nilesh Prakash Chavan and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra Thr the Dept. of Education and Ors.