Anita Sambhaji Kardule v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench administrative adjournment ('paucity') order dated 11.11.2025 passed by Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi and Hiten S. Venegavkar, JJ.: numerous Writ Petitions of 2024 and 2025 (with Civil Applications), Suo Motu (CP) No. 2 of 2024 in WP/9646/2024, and Criminal Application Nos. 248, 896, 954, 979 and 1034 of 2025 adjourned for paucity of time to 17.02.2026, 18.02.2026, 19.02.2026, 20.02.2026, 23.02.2026 and 24.02.2026; interim relief / undertakings / statements to continue till next date. No merits adjudication, no issues framed, no statutes or precedents cited.
What did the court decide?
All listed matters adjourned to the dates mentioned against them due to paucity of time; interim relief / undertaking / statement, if any, in these matters shall continue till next date. ¶5