Disposed¶4
Sai Industries through Its Proprietor Sanjay Chandrakant More v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others
Bombay HCWP/10952/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench; Arun R. Pedneker, J.; decided November 21, 2025; administrative 'DPT Order' (paucity of time): batch of over sixty matters (serials 977-1026) comprising Writ Petitions Nos. 269/2025 to 12721/2025 and 5020/2024, 9730/2024 etc., Civil Applications therein, and Second Appeal No. 268 of 2025 with connected applications; adjourned to 31/03/2026, 02/04/2026 and 06/04/2026; interim relief/undertaking/statement to continue till next date; no merits decision, no statutes or precedents cited, no parties or advocates named; classify as adjournment/'other'; not citable for any proposition of law.
What did the court decide?
The interim relief/undertaking/statement, if any, in these matters shall continue till next date. ¶4