Seema Ananda Patil and Anr. v. Sandip Ananda Patil and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Speaking to minutes; correction of inadvertent/clerical mistake in judicial order; 'Ratnagiri' corrected to 'Radhanagari' (Civil Judge, Junior Division); corrected order to be uploaded as Order No.2; conditional issuance of notice to respondents returnable 12th January 2026; automatic dismissal of writ petition if copies not supplied within one week; continuance of ad-interim relief till returnable date. Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction; Writ Petition No.10946 of 2025; Seema Ananda Patil (petitioner, through S. M. Raibagkar) v. Sandip Ananda Patil & Ors.; single judge S. G. Chapalgaonkar; dated December 2, 2025. No statutes or precedents cited; useful only as procedural illustration of minute-correction and conditional-notice practice.
What did the court decide?
Motion for speaking to minutes of the order dated 11th September 2025 allowed; that order to be corrected (substituting 'Civil Judge, Junior Division, Radhanagari' for 'Ratnagiri') and uploaded as Order No.2 in this matter. Petitioner to supply copies for service of notice on respondents within one week, failing which the writ petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to this Court; if copies are supplied, notice to respondents returnable on 12th January 2026. Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till the returnable date. The writ petition itself remains pending.