Yadnedeva Dhondiram Jangave v. the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment/pendency order, not citable on merits. High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench; WRIT PETITION NO. 10157 OF 2024, Ashabai Sainath Holambe v. The State of Maharashtra, heard with a large batch of connected writ petitions (serial listing 972–1019, including PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 34 OF 2025). Coram: Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi & Hiten S. Venegavkar, JJ.; dated November 27, 2025. Ground: paucity of time; next dates indicated as 10.03.2026 and 11.03.2026 (matter-to-date mapping obscured by garbled table). Direction that interim relief/undertaking/statement, if any, shall continue till next date. No statutes, precedents, issues or holdings; AGPs appeared for the respondent State (A.B. Girase G.P., S.K. Tambe, A.M. Phule, R.S. Wani, S.B. Narwade). Relevant only to demonstrate continued pendency and subsistence of interim orders.
What did the court decide?
Matters adjourned due to paucity of time to the dates mentioned in the listing (10.03.2026 / 11.03.2026); interim relief, undertaking or statement, if any, to continue till the next date.