Dismissed¶12

Indo Rama Synthetics (India) Limited, Nagpur v. Union of India, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Dept. of Revenue, New Delhi and Ors.

Bombay HC7 May 2025WP/1028/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal/dismissal order, High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench (Nagpur), W.P. No. 1028/2025, dated 07/05/2025, bench Avinash G. Gharote & Abhay J. Mantri, JJ.; petitioner Indo Rama Synthetics (India) Ltd., Nagpur (counsel S.S. Agrawal) v. Union of India and others (respondent nos. 1, 3 and 4: Ketki Vaidya-Jaltare; respondent nos. 2 and 6: T.H. Khan, AGP). Disposition: dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue alternate remedy; all points kept open. No statutes, precedents, framed issues, holdings or monetary quantum appear in the text.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail an alternate remedy as permissible in law; all points kept open. ¶12

Indo Rama Synthetics (India) Limited, Nagpur Vs Union of India, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Dept. of Revenue, New Delhi and Ors. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2025:BHC-NAG:5045-DB

¶2

wp 1028.2025.odt

¶3

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.1028/2025 Indo Rama Synthetics (India) Ltd., Nagpur V Union of India and others

¶6

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- -

¶7

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders or directions
and Registrar's orders

¶8

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ -
Mr. S.S. Agrawal, Advocate for petitioner.
Ms T.H. Khan, AGP for respondent nos. 2 and 6.

¶9

Mrs. Ketki Vaidya-Jaltare, Advocate for respondent nos.1, 3 and 4.

¶10

CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : 07/05/2025

¶11

Upon instructions, learned Counsel for the
petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail
an alternate remedy as permissible in law. His statement is
accepted.

¶12

iii.In view of the same, the petition is dismissed as
withdrawn with liberty as prayed for, keeping all the points
open.

¶13

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)

¶14

Deshmukh

Indo Rama Synthetics (India) Limited, Nagpur v. Union of India, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Dept. of Revenue, New Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indo Rama Synthetics (India) Limited, Nagpur v. Union of India, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Dept. of Revenue, New Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sohail Ahmed Ansari Khaleel Ahmed vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Education and Sports Department, Mumbai and Others

Manish Ratnadeep Kumbhare and Others Vs Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur Thr. Its Chairman and Another

Kishor S/O Hansraj Jham and Others vs Nagpur Municipal Corporation, Thr. Its Commissioner, Nagpur and Another

Jayashree D/O Ashok Gotmare and Others Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Secretary, Higher and Technical Education, Mumbai and Others

The Commissioner of Customs, Nagpur Commissionerate, Nagpur Vs M/S. Ramabors Exim LLP. Alimited Partnership, Lucknow (U.P.)

M.R. Bahu-Uddeshiya Vikas Sanstha, Gonida, Thr. Preisident, Anil Rajendra Gondane vs State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Higher and Technical Education Dept., Mumbai and Anr.