Nalini Maharudra Nadkarni v. Maharudra Balkrishna Nadkarni
Case brief
What is this about?
Testamentary petition 66 TP/5837/2025 (E-filing); Called for Direction; Company Registrar / Testamentary Registrar; Kavita Y. Ambekar; notice to non-consenting legal heirs; general notice; affidavit of service; justification of surety; Administration Bond; Rules 399 and 400 Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980; Rule 407 cross petition; praecipe; readiness for final grant; removed from board; decision date 24.11.2025; advocate V. P. Shastri.
What did the court decide?
Directions passed for issuance of notice (including to non-consenting legal heirs, if any), affidavit of service of general notice, service as per Rules 399 and 400, justification of surety of non-consenting legal heirs and furnishing of Administration Bond, verification of any cross petition under Rule 407, and filing of a praecipe when the matter is ready for final grant; the matter was removed from the board.