Mahesh Kanayalal Lulla v. Vanita Shyam Raheja
Case brief
What is this about?
Procedural 'Called for Direction' order dated 12.11.2025 by Company Registrar / Testamentary Registrar (Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar), Bombay High Court (Original Side), in Testamentary Petition 47 TP/5534/2025 (E-filing): issue of general Citation and Notice to the Collector; affidavit of service and service upon non-consenting legal heirs per Rules 399-400, Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980; verification of cross petitions and reference to Hon'ble Court per Rule 407; praecipe for final grant; matter removed from board. Advocates: Ms. Vinaya Supe i/b. Rajesh Wadhwani for petitioner. No issues framed, no holdings, no precedent treatment, no monetary quantum.
What did the court decide?
Interim administrative directions issued on a 'Called for Direction' listing: (i) Office to issue Citation and Notice to the Collector; (ii) petitioner's advocate to file Affidavit of Service of General Citation and effect service upon non-consenting legal heirs, if any, per Rules 399 and 400, Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980; (iii) Office to verify whether any cross petition is filed and, if so, place the matter before the Hon'ble Court under Rule 407; (iv) advocate to file praecipe when ready for final grant; matter removed from board.