Ivan Stephen Anchan Son of Silas Anchan vs Silas Anchan (Deceased No 1)

¶1

SLG

¶2

BEFORE : MRS. R. V. RANE , COMPANY REGISTRAR / TESTAMENTARY REGISTRAR Date: 18^th January, 2025

¶3

CALLED FOR COMPLIANCE :

¶4

23 TP/4909/2024 (E-filing)

¶5

Ms. Annie M. Sebastian i/b. Johnson John, Advocate for petitioner

¶6

PC : 1. Perused Petition. Heard Ld. Advocate for petitioner. Advocate for petitioner submits that the present petition is for Succession Certificate in respect of certain Securities belonging to the deceased No. 1 namely Silas Anchan who died at Mumbai on 28.06.2002. Copy of death certificate is annexed to the petition as Exhibit -‘A1’.

¶7

Deceased No. 2 namely Sarojini Anchan who died at Mumbai on 18.12.2007. Copy of death certificate is annexed to the petition as Exhibit -‘A2’.

¶8

Deceased No. 3 namely Oswald Samuel Anchan alias Oswald Sam Anchan who died at Mumbai on 04.07.2015. Copy of death certificate is annexed to the petition as Exhibit -‘A3’.

¶9

Advocate for petitioner submits that since identification proof of the deceased Nos. 1 to 3 are not available petitioner had filed Affidavit dated 14.06.2024 for dispensation of identification proof of the deceased Nos. 1 to 3. After perusal of the same it is found that the petitioner has mentioned that they had taken search, but the said identification proof of the deceased Nos. 1 to 3 are not available with them. Hence, the petitioner request that they may be permitted to file the present petition without the identification proof of the deceased Nos. 1 to 3. The said request is accepted. Copy of Affidavit for dispensation of identification proof of deceased Nos. 1 to 3 are annexed to the petition as Exhibit – “B”. …….2

¶10

SLG

¶11

– 2 –

¶12

Ld. Advocate for petitioner submits that deceased Nos. 1 to 3 ordinarily resided at T5 Sea Beach View, Kadeshwari Marg, Bandra West, Mumbai 400050, and left property throughout the State of Maharashtra, Gujarat and Chennai.

¶13

Ld. Advocate for petitioner submits that the said deceased Nos. 1 to 3 died intestate and that due and diligent search has been made for the Will but none has been found.

¶14

Ld. Advocate for petitioner submits that deceased Nos. 1 to 3 left behind them only legal heirs shown in the paragraph No. 11 of the petition, as per the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

¶15

5. Ld. Advocate for petitioner submits that parents of deceased Nos. 1 to 3 predeceased to them. Deceased Nos. 1 and 2 were survived by son and deceased No. 3 was survived by brother namely Ivan Stephen Anchan who is petitioner herein. Save and except there are no other legal heirs and next of kind left by the deceased, which is mentioned at para no. 11 of the petition.

¶16

Ld. Advocate for Petitioner submits that petitioner being son of deceased Nos. 1 and 2 and brother of deceased No. 3, claims to be entitled for full share in the estate left by the Deceased Nos. 1 to 3.

¶17

Ld. Advocate for petitioner submits that, there is no impediment under Section 370 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 or under any other provision of this Act or any other enactment to the grant of the certificate of the validity thereof if it was granted.

¶18

Ld. Advocate for petitioner submits that no application has been made to any District Court or District Delegate or to any High Court for probate of any Will of the said deceased or for letters of administration with or without the

¶19

Will for annexed to their property and credits. …...3

¶20

SLG

¶21

– 3 –

¶22

Ld. Advocate for petitioner submits that no application has been made to any District Court for Succession Certificate in respect of any debt or security belonging to the estate of the deceased.

¶23

Ld. Advocate for the petitioner submits that delay of filing this petition be condoned as the concerned authority asked for Succession Certificate recently for transferring the shares in the name of the legal heirs. In view thereof, delay is condoned.

¶24

Advocate for the petitioner submits that the General Notice was issued on 17.10.2024 in the aforesaid matter. Advocate for the petitioner submits that Affidavit of Service dated 13.12.2024 for proving the service of General Notice filed through e-filing.

¶25

Pursuant to order dated 28.02.2023 passed by Hon’ble Shri Justice Arif S. Doctor, in Testamentary Petition No. 2556 of 2022 and Testamentary petition No. 2559 of 2022 directions were given to the Registry, in all matters for Letters of Administration and Succession Certificate, whenever there is sole legal heir, who is Class -I legal heir, Registry is directed to not to insist for filing / furnishing of Administration Bond. Hence, as per direction of the Hon’ble Court filing of Administration Bond is dispensed with for the sole class I legal heir.

¶26

This petition is filed for grant of Succession Certificate in respect to the securities which was mentioned in Schedule-I which is annexed to the petition. The petitioner has complied all the necessary compliance for grant of the Succession Certificate in favor of the petitioner. Hence, facts stated by petitioner, on oath, remained unchallenged and required to be accepted. Accordingly, petition deserves to be allowed, as prayed for. Hence, following order :

…….4

SLG

– 4 –

ORDER

Petition is allowed and the Succession Certificate be granted to the petitioner for certain securities left by the deceased and shown in the Schedule-I, in prescribed format.

¶32

Before issuance of the grant, the office to verify whether any cross Petition is pending or Affidavit resisting the petition is filed.

¶33

18.01.2025

¶34

COMPANY REGISTRAR / TESTAMENTARY REGISTRAR

Ivan Stephen Anchan Son of Silas Anchan v. Silas Anchan (Deceased No 1)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ivan Stephen Anchan Son of Silas Anchan v. Silas Anchan (Deceased No 1)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ganesh Ramchandra Ranjane vs Ramchandra Bhikaji Ranjane (Deceased)

Adi Keki Motafram vs Sorab Jeejeebhoy Divecha (Deceased)

Arlindo a. De Souza vs David a. De Souza

Maharsh Sandeep Gupta vs Sandeep Surinderpal Gupta

Nixon Michael Raj vs Michael Raj

Rustam C. Patel vs Cawasji N. Patel (Deceased)