Yogesh ramapati pandey v. Ramapati pandey Alias Ramapati Hiralal pandey Alias Ramapati Heeralal pandey
Case brief
What is this about?
Testamentary petition directions order; Bombay High Court Testamentary Department; TP/4337/2025; citation within two weeks; notice to Collector; Rule 396; Rules 399 and 400; Rule 407; Rule 420; Chapter XXVI; Bombay High Court (O.S.) Rules, 1980; BHC Rules; non-consenting legal heirs; share of heir; administration bond; gross amount; General Citation; cross-petition; locker inventory; explain delay; proper prayer; S.O. 12.11.2025; P. A. Jagdale; V. K. Rajbjhar; Rupesh Lanjewar.
What did the court decide?
Interlocutory directions issued: citation within two weeks; notice to the Collector under Rule 396 BHC Rules; citation to non-consenting legal heirs, if any; compliance with Chapter XXVI requisitions; service of General Citation and upon non-consenting legal heirs per Rules 399-400; administration bond per Rule 420 where other legal heirs exist; verification of any cross-petition and referral under Rule 407; matter adjourned, S.O. to 12.11.2025.