Bimla Ramesh Bajaj v. Ramesh Rampratap Bajaj
Case brief
What is this about?
Testamentary petition; called for direction; probate/administration stage; none present for petitioner; non-consenting legal heirs; general notice; Affidavit of Service; surety justification; Administration Bond; cross petition verification; Rules 399 and 400; Rule 407; Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980; praecipe; final grant; removed from board; Company Registrar; Testamentary Registrar; Mrs. K. Y. Ambekar; e-filing; 20 June 2025.
What did the court decide?
Directions issued at the 'Called for Direction' stage: notice (including to non-consenting legal heirs) to be issued; Affidavit of Service of General Notice to be filed and service effected per Rules 399 and 400 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980; surety of non-consenting legal heirs to be justified and Administration Bond furnished; Office to verify any cross petition (Rule 407); praecipe to be filed when ready for final grant - matter removed from board.