Allowed¶26

Vijay Vasudeo Kulkarni v. Malti Ramakant Pansare (Deceased)

Probate – Testamentary Petition TP/241/2024 (ECHCBM02125762023)

Bombay HC7 Feb 2025TP/241/2024

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Testamentary probate granted on 07.02.2025 in TP/241/2024 (ECHCBM02125762023): Will dated 12.02.2022 of deceased Malti Ramakant Pansare (died 23.04.2023, Mumbai); executors Vijay Vasudeo Kulkarni and Avadhut Krishnaji Kulkarni; attesting witnesses Tushar Tukaram Mane and Somnath Vitthal Kale; consent affidavits of three sons of the deceased; Hindu Succession Act 1956; direction to verify no caveat or cross petition before issuance of probate; Ms. Nidhi Revankar i/b Revankar for petitioners.

What did the court decide?

Probate of the last Will and Testament granted as prayed; Office to issue Probate after verifying whether any Cross Petition or Caveat is filed. ¶26

Vijay Vasudeo Kulkarni vs Malti Ramakant Pansare… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2025)

¶1

ary

¶2

Before: Shri S. S. Agate Addl. Registrar (O.S.) / Addl. Prothonotary and Senior Master

¶3

Date : 07^th February, 2025.

¶4

CALLED FOR HEARING :

¶5

TP/241/2024 (ECHCBM02125762023) with

¶6

WILL/53/2024

¶7

) Ms. Nidhi Revankar i/b Revankar, Advocate for ) Petitioners.

¶8

)

¶9

)

¶10

) P.C.: 1. Perused Petition which is filed online. ) Heard Ld. Advocate for Petitioners. This ) Petition is for Probate of Last Will and

¶11

) ) Testament of the deceased filed by the ) Petitioners Vijay Vasudeo Kulkarni and ) Avadhut Krishnaji Kulkarni being the ) Executors named under the Will of the

¶12

) deceased. Deceased Malti Ramakant Pansare,

¶13

) ) said to have died at Mumbai on 23.04.2023. ) Copy of death certificate is annexed to the ) Petition. For identification proof of the

¶14

) deceased, copy of Aadhar Card is annexed to

¶15

) ) the Petition. ) ) 2. Ms. Revankar, Advocate for Petitioners

¶16

) submits that deceased left behind her last Will

¶17

) ) and Testament which was duly executed at ) Mumbai, on 12.02.2022. The said Will is in ) English language. ) ) 3. Ms. Revankar, Advocate for the Petitioner

¶18

) ) submits that deceased was governed under the ) Hindu Succession Act 1956. It is submitted ) that the parents and husband of the deceased ) pre-deceased the deceased. Save and except as

¶19

) mentioned in para – 10, there are no other

¶20

) legal heirs left by the deceased.

¶21

) ) ) 4. Petitioner’s Oath is filed. Consent Affidavits ) of three sons of the deceased as mentioned in ) para – 10 are on record. Affidavits of Tushar

¶22

)

¶23

Petitioner’s Oath is filed. Consent Affidavits of three sons of the deceased as mentioned in para – 10 are on record. Affidavits of Tushar Tukaram Mane and Somnath Vitthal Kale,

¶24

07.02.2025

¶25

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

¶26

both the attesting witnesses to the Will are filed. Affidavit of service of General Citation is filed. All the Affidavits are also filed online. All other legal formalities are complied with. Hence, Petition is granted.

¶27

Office to issue Probate as prayed after verifying whether any Cross Petition or Caveat is filed.

¶28

Addl. Registrar (O.S.) /

¶29

Addl. Prothonotary and Senior Master

Vijay Vasudeo Kulkarni v. Malti Ramakant Pansare (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Vasudeo Kulkarni v. Malti Ramakant Pansare (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

The Maharashtra Executor and Trustee Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs Dattatraya Shankar Shete

Rinku Dayal Hemrajani vs Durupati Motilal Vaswani (Deceased)

Yamini U Shah vs Kiran Dhansukhlal Gheewala (Deceased)

Anil Lachhman Jaisingh vs Kavita Lachhman Jaisingh (Deceased)

Bharti Hemendra Bhavsar vs Hemendra Kantilal Bhavsar (Deceased)

Ashok Shivajirao Patil vs Abhay Satish Salunke