Nobin Ramesh Chitnis vs Shamla Ramesh Chitnis (Deceased)

¶1

3 62.TP/1512/2025

¶2

Before: Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With Testamentary Department Date: 03rd September, 2025

¶3

FOR COMPLIANCE:

¶4

TP/1512/2025 P. C. : Shri. Saurabh Oka a/w Ms. Anita Patil Ld. (AMH20240126891C Advocate for the Petitioner 202400026) with WILL/605/2025 1) This petition is filed by petitioner, being one of the beneficiaries under the Will executed by Shamla Ramesh Chitnis (herein after the same is referred to as “Testatrix”), for grant of a Letters of Administration with Will annexed. Said Testatrix said to have died at Mumbai on 17/02/2014. Petitioner, namely Nobin Ramesh Chitnis, filed the copy of death certificate, identity proof of the testator, Will along with its official translation, petitioner's oath.

¶5

2) Perused petition. Heard Ld. Advocate for petitioner. Perused documents.

¶6

3) The petitioner has explained the delay vide Rule 382 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rule, 1980(for short “Rules”).

¶7

4) No executor has been appointed under the Will. The petitioner is the one of the beneficiary under the Will. Hence, petition is tenable.

¶8

5) Petitioner stated that the deceased left behind her last Will and Testament which was duly executed at Mumbai on 02.07.2012 and Registered on 21.07.2012, in Marathi language. Its official translation is filed on the record. The Will is handed in separately for being filed and kept in a safe place in the Office of the Prothonotary and Senior Master, High Court, Bombay.

¶9

6) Ld. Advocate for petitioner submits that Testatrix is survived by legal heirs, whose details are given in the petition’s paragraph No. 8, as per the provisions of Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The husband of the deceased was one of the legatee under the Will and since deceased to the

¶10

3 62.TP/1512/2025

¶11

deceased on 11.01.2016. Petitioner states that mother of the husband, was predeceased to the deceased. The petitioner affirmed that there are no other legal heirs of the deceased, except mentioned in the petition. Legal heir of the testatrix has consented to the petition and thereby waived the service of Citation.

¶12

7) Citation was issued, which has been duly affixed on the conspicuous part of the Hon’ble High Court and notice board of the Collector’s Office at Mumbai and 14 days have been expired vide Rule 397(1) and (4) of the Bombay High Court (O.S.) Rules, 1980(for short “BHC Rules”) and an affidavit to that effect has been filed. Notice to collector has been issued vide Rule 396 of BHC Rules. Till today, no one appeared to resist the claim of the petitioner or nothing is brought to the notice regarding pending litigation pertaining to the same properties. Hence, the petition is treated as uncontested one.

¶13

8) The petitioner has filed the affidavit of Mukund Govind Chandratre, one of attesting Witnesses to the Will, in form No.102 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. He deposed that deceased signed the Testament in his presence. Hence, enough evidence is on record to accept the execution of the Will and petitioner is succeeded to prove the execution of Will. According to him all additions and alteration in a Will were existed at the time of execution before signing the Will. Hence, there is sufficient compliance of the Rule 383 of the Rules.

¶14

9) Properties mentioned in the schedule-I of the petition are referred in the Will.

¶15

10) Other legatee, namely Nikhil Chitnis, has given consent to grant Letters of Administration to petitioner.

¶16

11) Petitioner has executed the administration Bond in the prescribed format. Hence, following order:

¶17

3 62.TP/1512/2025

¶18

ORDER

¶19

1) Petition is granted.

¶20

2) Office to issue Letters of Administration with Will annexed to the petitioner, as per the Rules, having effect throughout the State of Maharashtra.

¶21

3) Before issuance of Letters of Administration with Will, the office to verify that there is no cross Petition is pending or caveat is filed. Office to act accordingly.

¶22

03rd September, 2025 Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department

Nobin Ramesh Chitnis v. Shamla Ramesh Chitnis (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nobin Ramesh Chitnis v. Shamla Ramesh Chitnis (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Dastin Harry Masilamani Constituted Poa Holder of Ossie Maryan Masilamani vs Monty Harry Masilamani (Deceased)

Kalpana Vasant Waghamare vs Vasant Baburao Waghamare (Deceased)

Sita Pukhraj Bafna vs Pukhraj Chunilal Bafna (Deceased)

Sheshadri Pattancherry Lakshman / P. L. Seshadri Alias Mohan Nee Seshadri Lakshman Iyer and 2 Other vs Tattamangalam Seha Iyer Subbalakshmi Lakshman (Deceased)

Rhea Parthasarathy vs Ravi Parthasarathy (Deceased no. 1)

Manjula Kishor Doshi vs Kishor Himatlal Doshi Alias Kishore Himmatlal Doshi (Deceased)