Manjula Ramesh Jadhav vs Shankar Dharma Patil

¶1

3 84.TP/1422/2024

¶2

Before: Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With Testamentary Department Date: 11th March 2025

¶3

FOR COMPLIANCE:

¶4

TP/1422/2024 P. C. : Ms. Aarya Chavan Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner [Original] (ECHCBM020557020 1) This petition is filed by petitioner, being 23) one of the beneficiaries under the Will executed with by Shankar Dharma Patil (herein after the same WILL/533/2024

¶5

1) This petition is filed by petitioner, being one of the beneficiaries under the Will executed by Shankar Dharma Patil (herein after the same is referred to as “Testator”), for grant of a Letters of Administration with Will annexed. Said Testator said to have died at Mumbai on 13-072015. Petitioner, namely Manjula Ramesh Jadhav, filed the copy of death certificate, identity proof of the testator, Will along with its English translation, petitioner's oath.

¶6

2) Perused petition. Heard Ld. Advocate for petitioner. Perused documents. 3) The petitioner has explained the delay vide Rule 382 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rule, 1980(for short “Rules”). 4) No executor has been appointed under the Will. The petitioner is the one of the Legatee under the Will. Hence, petition is tenable. 5) Petitioner stated that the deceased left behind his last Will and Testament which was duly executed at Mumbai on 20.02.2014, in Marathi language. In view of the Order of the Hon’ble Court passed in the TP No. 1263/2023, the Ld. Advocate for the petitioner has filed an affidavit stating that the translation of the Will is true translation as per the contents of the Original Will. The original Will is handed in separately for being filed and kept in a safe place in the Office of the Prothonotary and Senior Master, High Court, Bombay.

¶7

6) Ld. Advocate for petitioner submits that parents of deceased predeceased testator and testator was survived by legal heirs, as per the provisions of Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Legal

¶8

3 84.TP/1422/2024

¶9

heirs of the testator have consented to the petition and thereby waived the service of Citation. The petitioner affirmed that there are no other legal heirs of the deceased.

¶10

7) Citation was issued, which has been duly affixed on the conspicuous part of the Hon’ble High Court and notice board of the Collector’s Office at Mumbai and 14 days have been expired vide Rule 397(1) and (4) of the Bombay High Court (O.S.) Rules, 1980(for short “BHC Rules”) and an affidavit to that effect has been filed. Notice to collector has been issued vide Rule 396 of BHC Rules. Till today, no one appeared to resist the claim of the petitioner or nothing is brought to the notice regarding pending litigation pertaining to the same properties. Hence, the petition is treated as uncontested one.

¶11

8) The petitioner has filed the affidavit of Manoj Rajkumar Shrivastav, one of Attesting Witnesses to the Will, in form No.102 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. He deposed that he was present and deceased signed the Testament in presence of him and another witness, after going through its contents. Hence, enough evidence is on record to accept the execution of the Will and petitioner is succeeded to prove the execution of Will. According to him all additions and alteration in a Will were existed at the time of execution and before singing the Will. Hence, there is sufficient compliance of the Rule 383 of the Rules.

¶12

9) Properties mentioned in the schedule-I of the petition are referred in the Will. 10) Other legatees under the Will, namely Madhu Jagdish Patil, a widow of Jagdish Patil and Direndra Shankar Patil, to whom the property situated in her native village is bequeathed, have given consent to grant Letters of Administration to petitioner.

¶13

11) Petitioner has executed the administration Bond in the prescribed format. Hence, following

3 84.TP/1422/2024

order:

ORDER

1) Petition is granted. 2) Office to issue Letters of Administration with Will annexed to the petitioner, upon satisfaction that the administration Bond is properly executed, as per the Rules, throughout State of Maharashtra. 3) Before issuance of Letters of Administration with Will, the office to verify that there is no cross Petition is pending or caveat is filed. Office to act accordingly.

¶18

11th March 2025 Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department

Manjula Ramesh Jadhav v. Shankar Dharma Patil

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manjula Ramesh Jadhav v. Shankar Dharma Patil

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Kailash Lalit Shah vs Lalit Jayantilal Shah (Deceased)

Yuvraj Sunil Savant vs Sunil Dattajirao Savant

Sonu Navsaram Temkar vs Anant Sonu Temkar(Deceased)

Ashokkumar Satpal Mehra vs Satpal Devidas Mehra (Deceased)

Archana Ashok Bandekar vs Amita Ashok Bandekar (Deceased)

Amit Santosh Tiwari vs Santosh Shivnath Tiwari