Bapuso Shankar Yadav and Ors. v. Sham Wamanrao Jagtap Deceased and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal admission, Bombay High Court, Madhav J. Jamdar; substantial questions of law on whether Defendant No.1 could use a power of attorney to execute a sale-deed in favour of Defendant Nos. 2 and 3 despite concurrent findings that the M.O.U. only secured repayment of a loan and that repayment of Rs.25,00,000/- out of Rs.33,25,000/- was proved; irrevocability of Power of Attorney dated 29.09.2006 (Exhibit 66) lacking recitals of consideration or interest created in the Agent; appellants Bapuso Shankar Yadav & Ors.; respondents Sham Wamanrao Jagtap & Ors.; counsel Girish Godbole (Senior Counsel) and Prasad Nagavekar for Appellants.
What did the court decide?
Appeal admitted on the following substantial questions of law (a)-(c); no adjudication on merits in this order. ¶¶13