Vikas Chandrakant Pandit v. Jagannath Tatyaba Gardi Mali
Case brief
What is this about?
Consent quashing and remand — Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, Sections 32(g), 32(h), 32(m); Tahsildar-cum-Agricultural Land Tribunal, Baramati, Dist-Pune; tenancy application to be decided afresh in accordance with law; liberty to file documents and amend pleadings; appearance fixed 24.03.2025; time-bound direction of six months; continuation of interim order till fresh decision; Review Petition No. 96 of 2024 in Writ Petition No. 9135 of 2023; parties: Vikas Chandrakant Pandit & Ors. v. Jagannath Tatyaba Gardi (Mali) & Ors.; single judge (N.R. Borkar, J.); no contested adjudication, disposal by consent.
What did the court decide?
Review petition and writ petition disposed of; orders impugned in the writ petition and the Tahsildar-cum-Agricultural Land Tribunal, Baramati order quashed and set aside by consent; Tahsildar directed to decide the tenancy application afresh in accordance with law with liberty to file documents and amend pleadings, parties to appear on 24.03.2025, decision endeavoured within six months; interim order to continue till such decision.