Disposed¶12
Neelam W/O Punit Barmase and Another v. Punit S/O Sujay Barmase
Bombay HCREVN/36/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
CRL Revision Application 36 of 2024; Bombay HC Nagpur Bench; Urmila Joshi Phalke; dated 13-08-2025; petitioner Neelam W/o Punit Barmase and another; respondent Punit S/o Sujay Barmase; counsel Y.R. Kinkhede (petitioner side), Vishnu B Gawali (respondent side); matter stood over / adjourned by consent for 2 weeks ('S.o. 2 weeks'); order for Registrar Judicial; no merits adjudication, no statute or precedent cited.
What did the court decide?
No adjudication on merits recorded. Operative direction only: by consent of the parties, 'S.o.' 2 weeks (apparently a two-week stand-over/adjournment); order marked '( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL )'. ¶12