Ratandeep Kashinath Kamble v. the State of Maharashtra Throu. the District Collector Ratnagiri and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court PIL disposed on assurances; protection of existing Buddh Vihar Ratnagiri City; conversion into community centre objected; Ratnagiri Nagar Parishad respondent no.4; Ratnagiri District Planning Committee administrative approval order 09/09/2024 No. 3186/24 sought quashed; E-Tender Notice no.5 of 2024-2025 dated 11/09/2024; Work Order no. 526/3511 dated 08/10/2024; Maharashtra Suvarna Jayanti Nagarothan Mahaabhiyan; submissions of Government Pleader and Nagar Parishad counsel recorded; no damage to Buddh Vihar; adjacent-area development only; grievance redressed; no further orders; Alok Aradhe Chief Justice; Sandeep V. Marne J; 24 June 2025; petitioner clerk attached to Ratnagiri advocate; exhibits A, B, C.
What did the court decide?
The Court recorded on its record the submissions made on instructions by the learned Government Pleader for respondent nos.1 to 3 and by learned counsel for respondent no.4 (Ratnagiri Nagar Parishad) that no damage in any manner would be caused to the existing Buddh Vihar, and that the Parishad intends to develop only the adjacent area without causing any damage to the existing Buddh Vihar.