Samruddhi Avinash Chavan v. Avinash Rajaram Chavan
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court, N. J. Jamadar J., 9 May 2025, Misc. Civil Application No. 72 of 2025 — transfer of matrimonial proceeding HMP/199/2024 (Marriage Petition No. 199 of 2024) from Civil Judge SD Khed to Civil Judge SD Vasai allowed; wife's convenience commands precedence in transfer of matrimonial proceedings; prohibitive Khed-Vasai distance; three proceedings pending at Vasai incl. FIR No. 294/2021 (Arnala Police Station; IPC 498-A, 338, 323, 504, 506) and DV Act 2005 proceeding; respondent granted video-conferencing attendance; record transfer within four weeks; no costs; parties: Samruddhi Avinash Chavan (applicant-wife), Avinash Rajaram Chavan (respondent-husband); advocates: Dinesh Shinde i/b Datta Mane (applicant), Sumit Kothari (respondent).
What did the court decide?
Application allowed: HMP/199/2024 transferred from the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Khed, to the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Vasai, for hearing and disposal in accordance with law; the Khed court directed to send the record and proceedings so as to reach the Vasai court within four weeks of communication of the order; respondent free to appear through video conferencing; application disposed of with no costs.