Allowed¶12

Damini Rohit Dighe v. Rohit Nandkumar Dighe

Bombay HC28 Feb 2025MCA/578/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Consent-based transfer of matrimonial proceeding; Marriage Petition No. 53/2024/A transferred to Family Court, Nashik Road, Nashik within four weeks; no-objection affidavit-in-reply dated 6 November 2025 by respondent husband; expedited hearing; undertaking against unnecessary adjournments; liberty to approach Mediation Centre, District Court Nashik with appointment of trained Mediator; Bombay High Court, single judge (Rajesh S. Patil, J.); MCA 578/2024; decision dated 17 November 2025.

What did the court decide?

Misc. Civil Application No. 578/2024 allowed in terms of prayer clause (a): Marriage Petition No. 53/2024/A to be transferred to the Family Court at Nashik Road at Nashik within four weeks, hearing expedited, with liberty to the parties to approach the Mediation Centre of the District Court, Nashik. ¶12

Damini Rohit Dighe vs Rohit Nandkumar Dighe — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶12

Issue for consideration

Whether Marriage Petition No. 53/2024/A should be transferred to the Family Court at Nashik Road at Nashik.

¶13

Ratio / Principle

In view of the affidavit-in-reply filed by the respondent, husband, recording his 'no objection', the present Misc. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

¶12

Key takeaways

The proceedings of Marriage Petition No. 53/2024/A shall stand transferred to the Family Court at Nashik Road at Nashik.ratio¶13
The transfer is to be completed within a period of four weeks, and the hearing of the said Petition is expedited.ratio¶16
On a fair request made through learned counsel, the parties are free to approach the Mediation Centre of the District Court, Nashik to resolve their disputes amicably; if such application is made, a trained Mediator is to be appointed.obiter

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bombay High Court (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction), Rajesh S. Patil, J., order dated 17 November 2025 in Misc. Civil Application No. 578/2024 (Damini Rohit Dighe v. Rohit Nandkumar Dighe): the respondent-husband tendered an affidavit-in-reply dated 6 November 2025 stating he had 'no objection' to the application being allowed; on that basis the Court allowed the application in terms of prayer clause (a) and directed that the proceedings of Marriage Petition No. 53/2024/A be transferred to the Family Court at Nashik Road at Nashik within four weeks, with the hearing expedited. The parties were to co-operate with the learned Judge for early disposal and, through their advocates, undertook not to seek unnecessary adjournments. On a fair request through learned counsel, the parties were left free to approach the Mediation Centre of the District Court, Nashik, where a trained Mediator is to be appointed to resolve the dispute amicably.

Damini Rohit Dighe v. Rohit Nandkumar Dighe

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Damini Rohit Dighe v. Rohit Nandkumar Dighe

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rupali Vilas Londhe vs State of Maharashtra

Manojkumar Chhajer vs State of Maharashtra

Ramesh Harakchand Gada and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra

Rahul Omprakash Singh vs State of Maharashtra

Omkar Vijay Kalokhe vs the State of Maharashtra

Shri Krishnakumar K Ashar vs Mr Archie John Varel (Dec.) Thr. Lrs. Cynthia Archie Varel and Ors.