Mandar Prakash Dhas v. Madhura Mandar Dhas

Bombay HC17 Jun 2025MCA/559/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Transfer of matrimonial/domestic violence proceeding; Bombay High Court, MCA 559 of 2024; Mandar Prakash Dhas versus Madhura Mandar Dhas; Rajesh S. Patil, J.; Family Court Pune; Judicial Magistrate First Class Pune; Solapur; Section 125 Criminal Procedure Code; Section 498; restitution of conjugal rights; D.V. proceedings; custody of two children; earlier transfer orders in MCA Nos. 21, 12 and 18 of 2020 dated 18 August 2021; respondent served, none appeared; adjourned to 14 October 2025 for final disposal; no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted at this stage; matter stood over to 14 October, 2025 for final disposal, with the applicant directed to inform the respondent of the date. ¶¶26

Mandar Prakash Dhas vs Madhura Mandar Dhas — Maintenance and Alimony | Bombay HC (2025)

¶1

KVM

¶2

1/2

¶3

29 - MCA 559 OF 2024.doc

¶4

Digitally signed by KANCHAN KANCHAN VINOD VINOD MAYEKAR MAYEKAR Date: 2025.09.29 12:59:29 +0530

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶6

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶7

MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 559 OF 2024

¶8

Mandar Prakash Dhas ….. Applicant

VERSUS

Madhura Mandar Dhas

….. Respondent

Mr. Ajinkya Udane for the Applicant.

¶13

CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

¶14

DATE : 26 SEPTEMBER, 2025

¶15

P.C. :-

¶16

Mr.Udane, learned advocate appearing for the applicant –

¶17

husband submits that the respondent-wife has filed four proceedings against the applicant husband viz., (1) petition for restitution of conjugal rights at Solapur, (2) complaint under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code at Solapur, (3) D.V. proceedings at Solapur and (4) Section 498 proceedings at Pune.

¶18

He submits that the first three proceedings filed by the wife were transferred from Solapur to Pune pursuant to the order passed in Miscellaneous Civil Application Nos. 21, 12 and 18 of 2020 by order dated 18 August, 2021.

¶19

KVM

¶20

2/2

¶21

29 - MCA 559 OF 2024.doc

¶22

He submits that out of the wedlock of the applicant with

¶23

the respondent, there are two children born, who are residing with the applicant husband from December 2023 pursuant to the order passed in the custody petition. He submits that the divorce proceeding has been filed by the applicant husband before the Family Court at Pune and the restitution petition filed by the wife is also pending before the Family Court at Pune. So also, Section 125 Criminal Procedure Code proceeding filed by the wife has been transferred to the Family Court at Pune. Therefore, it will be convenient for both the parties, if the D.V. proceeding filed by the husband are transferred to the Family Court at Pune from Judicial Magistrate First Class, Pune.

¶24

Office remark shows that the respondent has been served.

¶25

However, none appears for the applicant when the matter is called out.

¶26

Stand over to 14 October, 2025 . Matter to come up for final disposal.

¶27

The applicant is directed to inform the respondent that now the matter is kept for final disposal on 14 October, 2025.

¶28

[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]

Mandar Prakash Dhas v. Madhura Mandar Dhas

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mandar Prakash Dhas v. Madhura Mandar Dhas

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mahesh Shantaram Dalvi vs Mr. Deepak v. Parekh and Anr.

Arista N Nachane vs Nitin Krushnarao Nachane

Rupali Bhimsha Chougule vs Bhimsha Swaminath Chougule

Continental Hiring Co. vs Simplex Infrastructure Ltd.

Sneha Ankan Ashish vs Ankan Binodkumar Ashish

Pankaj Bhimarao Pawar vs Shivganga Pankaj Pawar